Wouldn't be the first time I misunderstood what Stu was talking about. It
was in the lecture he gave at um6p, ah, here,
https://youtu.be/GTQJqpkVd84?t=1820, I guess it's in this paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.15271.pdf
-- rec --
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:09 PM Frank Wimberly wrote:
> The
The real numbers are an uncountable set.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023, 3:14 PM Roger Critchlow wrote:
> I'm just noodling around.
>
> So it's a collection of innumerable elements which can't be a mathematical
>
I'm just noodling around.
So it's a collection of innumerable elements which can't be a mathematical
set, so you can't use the mathematics founded on sets to analyze it, so
what's the paper doing using set based mathematics to count the number of
elements in M_t?
-- rec --
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023
Google's response to ChatGPT has a waitlist, https://bard.google.com/ .
In other news I have been asking chatGPT which jobs are going to be the
most secure from AI replacementAI. It seems like plumbing might be the
most safe. Health Clinicians look like they are going to be in trouble.
_ Cody
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 1:52 PM cody dooderson wrote:
> The chat GPT demo does not have up to date information, which would
> seriously hamper it's abilities to be a good CEO. I asked it about recent
> tornados in the Midwest and it replied that it doesn't have any training
> data after September
Stephen,
Very smart to put my question re: CEOs vs AI to ChatGPT. My question
regarded “medium and long-term” capabilities. Your query to the bot
was for the present time. And yet, nevertheless, I interpret the bot’s
response to you to be, essentially, that there are certain CEO
positions
The chat GPT demo does not have up to date information, which would
seriously hamper it's abilities to be a good CEO. I asked it about recent
tornados in the Midwest and it replied that it doesn't have any training
data after September 2021. Surely a model can be made too stay up to date
with
Stephen,
Very smart to put my question re: CEOs vs AI to ChatGPT. My question
regarded “medium and long-term” capabilities. Your query to the bot was for
the present time. And yet, nevertheless, I interpret the bot’s response to
you to be, essentially, that there are certain CEO positions that AI
It sounds like "the Adjacent Possible" just ain't possible* in AI
land? With the punchline "you just can't get there from here"?
So what is the graph geodesic distance across the adjacent possible
between "today" and Kurzweil's /singularity/? And is the topology of
"the Singularity" a
And follow up prompt GPT:
Stephen: good. Imagine business conditions or models where an AI could
serve as a ceo
chatGPT: While it might be challenging for an AI to completely replace a
human CEO, there are certain business conditions or models where an AI
could potentially serve as an effective
I've understood the role of a CEO to be generally:
1) set the vision of the company
2) recruit talent
3) foster a culture to execute the vision
4) be the ultimate representive of the company externally
5) make critical decisions affecting the health of the company
Btw, chatGPTs understanding is
Good point, Roger. And any “old buddy” system among the board and musical
chairs they play with the CEO position would tend to make them hunker down to
protect their power structure. It might take the stockholders, once they
finally gain confidence in AI, and see how much money can be saved, to
I think that it depends on having a board of directors/private owner
prepared to take their hands off the wheel.
The main problem would be trolls attempting adversarial prompts. However
comfortable you might get with the ai's ability to handle the day to day
affairs, would you ever feel safe
Good point, Cody!
> On Mar 31, 2023, at 9:16 PM, cody dooderson wrote:
>
> While I think that AI could soon handle the managerial part of a CEO's job,
> they may have trouble playing golf. It might not matter if the stock is going
> up.
> I am very ignorant about what CEO's do 'though.
>
>
While I think that AI could soon handle the managerial part of a CEO's job,
they may have trouble playing golf. It might not matter if the stock is
going up.
I am very ignorant about what CEO's do 'though.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023, 5:33 PM Grant Holland
wrote:
> So what do you think? Are CEOs, CFOs
So what do you think? Are CEOs, CFOs etc. and corporate board members at any
medium or short-term risk of losing their jobs to machine learning? I like to
hear some opinions on this.
Thx,
Grant
> On Mar 31, 2023, at 1:21 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote:
>
> A... looking more closely, Grant wrote
A... looking more closely, Grant wrote CxO not QxO. Google quickly
enlightened me on the former. Sorry for the noise.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:19 PM Gary Schiltz wrote:
>
> I must admit my ignorance here, not aided in the least by a cursory
> Google search: What is QxO?
>
> On Thu, Mar 30,
I must admit my ignorance here, not aided in the least by a cursory
Google search: What is QxO?
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:59 AM Grant Holland
wrote:
>
> Frank,
>
> I'm wondering why no-one seems to raise the specter that AI could start
> replacing management personnel. And I’m including CxO’s
I agree, Russ. I taught at Pitt and Carnegie Mellon for 25 years or so.
Frank
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, 2:42 PM Russ Abbott wrote:
> Look at all the online course companies such as Coursera. They haven't
>
Look at all the online course companies such as Coursera. They haven't
replaced college teachers. I suspect that one reason is that online courses
have no person-to-person mechanism to help students live up to the
discipline necessary to do well in a course. As a retired and somewhat
cynical
Frank,
I'm wondering why no-one seems to raise the specter that AI could start
replacing management personnel. And I’m including CxO’s here; because I’m not
convinced that CxO-ing is rocket science or quantum mechanics. Think of the
billions saved. After all, if machine learning cannot get
There’s a nice subtext to why this is true. It isn’t only the mechanics of the
task.
People care what bulldozer operators do.
> On Mar 30, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>
> Not particularly relevant to your main point but Raj Reddy, close colleague
> of Newell and Simon, once
Not particularly relevant to your main point but Raj Reddy, close colleague
of Newell and Simon, once said, "It is easier use AI to replace a college
professor than a bulldozer operator" or words tho that effect.
Frank
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
23 matches
Mail list logo
