Here is a round up of opinion re the recent FCC decision gleaned from
WongBlog. I would be surprised if you folks didn't have opinions about it
.. . I think, by the way, that WB is by far the best of the newsgleaners.
Nick
1. Top story: Is the third time the charm for the FCC?
http://www.popsci.com/article/gadgets/what-know-about-net-neutrality-ruling?src=SOCdom=fb
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
On 1/15/14, 9:30 PM, Gillian Densmore wrote:
http://www.popsci.com/article/gadgets/what-know-about-net-neutrality-ruling?src=SOCdom=fb
Do we want to pay more for a commons, to foster access and innovation?
Is it progressive to give a competitive advantage to big companies that
can pay
With all the buzz about Google Verizon, I'm surprised at the use of the term
Net Neutrality including Quality of Service.
The pundits are concerned that somehow QoS (differential bandwidth/latency)
according to service will Destroy The Net As We Know It!!
My understanding from early on was
I believe a major part of the concern is that a provider can decide to provide
better service for some rather than equal service for all. For example, if you
use comcast as your provider, you would be affected if Comcast provided their
own streaming video at a high QoS while giving Netflix,
