Dear FRIAM...
I'm excited and happy to subscribe to the group. (Thanks for the invite
Stephen, - and David.) For many years I have architected and implemented
large-scale (mostly Java) enterprise software (applications and systems)
for corporations and gov. institutions mostly in North
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
Grant Holland
9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
Grant Holland
Principal
Grant Holland Associates
404.427.4759
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe
I second Owen's request. Could you discuss how it can be applied to CAS?
Thanks,
Grant
Owen Densmore wrote:
On Apr 7, 2010, at 12:10 PM, John Kennison jkenni...@clarku.edu wrote:
Hi Leigh,
snip
Nick introduced me to Rosen’s “Life Itself” and I have skimmed some articles by
Rosen. I am
but these are not on dynamical systems.)
I'm working on the PDF paper.
--John
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant
Holland [grant.holland...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 10:46 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied
Stephen, I like where (I think) you are going with this.
Grant
Stephen Guerin wrote:
Apple is dictating apps must be written in approved languages.
Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or
JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code
written
There are theorems because systems have relationships as well as
elements, from which arise emergent properties.
Grant
Russ Abbott wrote:
I have what probably seems like a strange question: why are there
theorems? A theorem is essentially a statement to the effect that
some domain is
care,
Grant
Grant Holland wrote:
There are theorems because systems have relationships as well as
elements, from which arise emergent properties.
Grant
Russ Abbott wrote:
I have what probably seems like a strange question: why are there
theorems? A theorem is essentially a statement
Sarbajit,
My take is that contemporary abstract mathematicians have no interest
(as mathematicians) in discerning truth. The truth about existence
is the business of scientists, philosophers and theologians.
Ever since Hilbert's program at the beginning of the twentieth century
to
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
Grant Holland
Santa Fe, NM
You might enjoy this related quote from Jacques Monod - Nobel laureate
and considered by many as the father of molecular biology:
We call these [mutation] events accidental; we say that they are random
occurrences. And since they constitute the /only/ possible source of
modifications in the
work-at-home, occasional online meetings, little (if any) travel.
Contact me via return email or cell.
Thanks,
Grant
--
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
FRIAM Applied
.
--
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http
, maps at http://www.friam.org
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development
28, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Grant Holland
grant.holland...@gmail.com mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
What is your opinion about certification in the Java world at
this point?
Grant
Prof David West wrote:
Pamela, my replies do not seem to get posted
with a very sharp gradient between
them. Will that ever dissipate?
What I think is more to the point is that potential energy gradients
will dissipate. Nature abhors a potential energy gradient -- but not
all gradients.
-- Russ
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Grant Holland
grant.holland
...@redfish.com
mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Grant Holland
*Sent:* Saturday, August 07, 2010 2:06 PM
*To:* russ.abb...@gmail.com; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] entropy and uncertainty, REDUX
Russ - Yes
a person to be predicting; organization is
there even if there is no one there to predict one part from another.
N
*From:* friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com]
*On Behalf Of *Grant Holland
*Sent:* Saturday, August 07, 2010 2:06 PM
*To:* russ.abb...@gmail.com
that what we see is a feature of what is
there. Not all careful observational techniques reveal the same aspect.
n
*From:* friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com]
*On Behalf Of *Russ Abbott
*Sent:* Saturday, August 07, 2010 3:45 PM
*To:* Grant Holland
*Cc:* The Friday
What? Nobody mentioned Proust, James Joyce or Woolf? (I'm not going to.)
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/8/2010 11:54 PM, Alison Jones wrote:
After 10 years of lurking something I can finally comment
everywhere: That is, it can
be proved rigorously that in every consistent formal system that
contains a certain amount of finitary number theory there exists
undecidable arithmetic propositions and that, moreover, the consistency
of any such system cannot be proved in the system.
Grant Holland
VP
Thanks, Steve. I've noticed that the breadth of you reading is
exceptional.
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/9/2010 10:45 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
Grant -
Thanks for the reminder, I haven't visited Castenada since I was in my
Don't forget Sound and Sense by Laurence Perrine.
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/9/2010 6:29 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
Pamela Steve:
Winging their way to me via the magic of the Internet
and Amazon Books are three books
Nothing is more made up than pure math. That's why we love it so
much. ;-)
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 10/14/2010 10:23 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Robert C. wrote:
What's curious is that he believes we get
that these particular nucleotides are part of active genes (if I read
the article correctly).
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 12/3/2010 9:09 AM, peggy miller wrote:
Anyone hear of how the microorganism is doing besides that it is alive
be worth more than the absence of sales tax. Unless you get a discount
from Amazon as well.
Grant
Grant Holland
VP, Product Development and Software Engineering
NuTech Solutions
404.427.4759
On 1/22/2011 11:33 AM, joseph spinden wrote:
I have an MBA -- not that I see the relevance. for me
Excellent, Peter. That puts the situation in brighter light.
Grant
On 1/26/2011 1:19 PM, plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
Wot is this Thing called Credibility? How measured? And where listed?
Ya want credibility, go join the American Physical Society. Pay yer
dues ($186 p.a., college degree
Eric,
Would love to read the Ashby/Conant article. I don't see at download
link on the page at SFI website
ttp://www.santafe.edu/library/foundational-papers-complexity-science/
however. Any other suggestions how I can download it?
Thanks,
Grant
On 2/6/11 7:27 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Nick,
find it easily, please get back to me and I
will find it for you.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant
Holland
Sent
Thanks, Glenn. I was able to find the article from Nick's suggestion -
and ran into lots of other good stuff too.
Grant
On 2/7/11 5:31 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
http://content.wuala.com/contents/gepr/public/every-good-regulator-must-model-Conant_Ashby_(1970).pdf
On 2/7/11 10:12 AM,
Peter - Fascinating.
I too vote that you make available to the FRIAM alias your referenced
paper so that we all can get the benefit of you wisdom on this.
Grant
On 5/7/11 1:22 PM, plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
The videos are wonderful, and I thank Nick, and agree with his
opinion. As for
Interesting note on information and uncertainty...
Information is Uncertainty. The two words are synonyms.
Shannon called it uncertainty, contemporary Information theory calls
it information.
It is often thought that the more information there is, the less
uncertainty. The opposite is the
, have the effect
of increasing the range of behaviors likely to occur in the receiver. This
would seem to correspond to a negative value for the information calculation.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05
Oops. I meant to say I am very tickled! (not ticked :-{ )
Grant
On 6/6/11 9:48 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
I'm very ticked. The point seems to be that one pick your favorite -
philosophy, physics,... is supreme within some dependency hierarchy
of disciplines.
I wondering, epistemologically
Me too. IMAP through Tbird on macs and pcs.
On 6/9/11 9:07 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote:
I've been using gmail via IMAP for at least five years, and haven't found it to
be bad at all, though I'm not that fond of its web interface either. I started
using gmail with Thunderbird under Windows XP, and
Jochen,
I hope this doesn't mean that we are now going to have /two/ places to
go to follow FRIAM conversations: The FRIAM mail alias AND a Google+
Circle!!
Grant
On 7/9/11 1:27 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
Hi Victoria,
Welcome :-) I added Glen and Robert to my FRIAM
circle, is this your
. And it
is interesting to check out a new technology.
Are you on Google+, too?
It is more a real threat for Facebook and
Twitter, because it offers similar features,
only better.
-J.
- Original Message - From: Grant Holland
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: Saturday
FYI - My friend Don Strel sent me this YouTube link on the 3D Printer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZboxMsSz5Aw. Looks like a big piece of
von Neumann's machine...(sans the instructions)...
Grant
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group
for the information calculation.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 11:07 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; Steve Smith
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Quote of the week
Interesting note
Of
Grant Holland
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 11:07 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; Steve Smith
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Quote of the week
Interesting note on information and uncertainty...
Information is Uncertainty. The two words are synonyms.
Shannon called it uncertainty
with a set amount of that something, and take it
away in chunks, then the amount that is there plus the amount that is
gone always equals the amount we started with. What is the additional
insight?
Eric
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 04:27 PM, *Grant Holland
grant.holland...@gmail.com* wrote
Russ,
I had the same feeling about my recent missive - entitled Uncertainty
vs Information - redux and resolution - in which I too make various
claims about information theory. I believe I had only one response -
from Eric. I expected more, maybe from Owen and Frank and yourself.
The APS
Exciting, Russ. I've downloaded your 2004 paper
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0001020v6, and will take a look.
Thanks,
Grant
On 7/26/11 3:16 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
Of course, I published a paper in 2004 (Why Occams Razor) doing
essentially the same thing (I expanded on this somewhat in my
Rich,
Wow. Thanks for passing on such a refreshing and informative article.
You get my vote for the most entertaining FRIAM post of the year (so far).
Grant
On 8/18/11 9:11 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
no one shall expel us from the paradise that Cantor has created,
Hugh Woodin's ultimate L:
Owen,
Excellent high-level description of IP.
I might mention that the protocol in many ways mimics what we all do
when we encounter a stop sign on the roadways. No central governor
required there either.
Grant
On 9/5/11 2:19 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Nice point.
When David mentioned the
Thanks, Owen. That was helpful. I usually catch this at 11pm, but missed
it that night.
Grant
On 12/3/11 1:38 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
Bring lots of pictures! Maybe a slide show on Adventurous Moves at SFX?
-- Owen
FRIAM
Abstract mathematicians are just making up stuff however they want. They
are artists whose clay is (in the modern view) formal logic. The
nature of their creation is its own reason for being. Abstract
mathematics is not natural science, nor is it the province of natural
scientists. If one of
George's observation (from Saturday) under mathematician pretty much
captures the issue for me. One can define primeness any way one wants.
The choice of excluding 1 has the fun consequence that George explains
so well. Maybe including 1 has other fun consequences. If so, then
give that
Nick,
Did you go to the GA website
http://www.google.com/analytics/index.html and follow all the
instructions?
Did you first set up an account and a profile?
Once you have a GA account and profile, you have to generate the correct
Java script tracking code.
To find out how to generate the
Thanks for the update, Nick. It was very helpful to me.
Grant
On 1/21/12 11:05 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Dear everybody,
I have been working at the edges of the occupy/99% movement in Santa Fe,
where we just put together a sizeable demonstration to welcome the governor
and the legislature
Dean, Frank, Owen,
That would be 3 hours delightfully spent. Sign me up.
Thanks! -
Grant
On 1/24/12 8:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
This is a message from Dean Gerber. For some reason it didn't reach
the List when he sent it. I forward it at his request. I will
certainly attend the
Friends,
It is with the deepest regret that I must tell you that our friend,
colleague and inspiration Peter Lissaman passed away in Santa Fe early
Sunday morning. His piquant humor, brilliant insight, instrumental
contributions and colorful history in science and engineering in the
latter
Why can't we dominate the whole book publishing industry by implementing
the books that we write as ebooks (format undefined) and giving them
away for free?
After all, books are software. They aren't programming, but they are
software. So why can't we implement an open source model for our
George,
I signed.
Thanks,
Grant
On 11/22/12 1:31 PM, George Duncan wrote:
Greetings. Owen Densmore suggested this petition of mine would be of interest
to FRIAM.
Hi,
As a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer (Philippines '65-'67) I have experienced
the value of Peace Corps.
That's why I
Owen,
How do you square your pro-HTML5 position with Facebook's backtracking
om HTML5 - and returning to the world of actual applications?
Grant
On 1/23/13 6:21 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
This might be interesting: mozilla and a web-centric phone os. If
they really do move the phone world
Pamela,
You can also share the DVD drive of another Mac from your new MacBook Air.
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Pamela McCorduck pam...@well.com wrote:
Whoops, more votes coming in. The idea of a MacBook Air plus external CD/DVD
player is very interesting.
Owen - Great post. Hope some other folks will respond in kind. Might be
interesting to get an 'inventory of digital lifestyles'. - Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net wrote:
Our recent conversation on buying a computer made me repeat a
Owen,
Here's a gimmick I came up with last year. Seems to work - but who knows...
I use a combination of two patterns - one for consistency (the
static), the other for change (the dynamic).
_The key is that both are physical, geometric concepts relative to the
keys on qwerty keyboard_ -
David,
What is YOUR opinion on the matter? Do you, or are you intending to,
teach any MOOCs or other online programs? Does Highlands offer, or plan
to offer any. (I assume you are still at Highlands.)
Thanks,
Grant
On 3/27/13 9:19 AM, Prof David West wrote:
those discussing MOOCs recently,
, Grant Holland wrote:
David,
What is YOUR opinion on the matter? Do you, or are you intending to,
teach any MOOCs or other online programs? Does Highlands offer, or plan
to offer any. (I assume you are still at Highlands.)
I left Highlands in December (three months back) but I am actively
engaged
Glen, Steve,
Glen's latest retort on this thread (see below) gave me this thought: It
would be interesting if you guys could offer an (admittedly
oversimplified) analytical model of your best guesses on what the
productivity function and the acceleration function (2nd derivative of
the
and h_o is some
tech-accelerating-maximum population of humans. h_o becomes some sort
of optimal clique size. h_f is some sort of failure size larger than h_o.
Grant Holland wrote at 05/17/2013 11:51 AM:
Glen's latest retort on this thread (see below) gave me this thought: It
would be interesting
included under the right conditions?
Grant
On 5/17/13 4:16 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Damn it Grant. Why do responses to you not go to the list by default? ;-)
Grant Holland wrote at 05/17/2013 02:41 PM:
Looks like to me that your p(h) function's sensitivity to human
population size is well
Glen,
Your arguments are very considered, deliberate - even careful - and
polite. However, let me pile on with this screed:
I thought that the kind of general governmental overreach that we are
talking about here was the reason we took on the USSR as an enemy during
the 1950s+ (not to
Bravo!, Glen. I've uttered precisely those words many times: ...there
is no such thing as teaching. There is only learning.
This can be understood when one asks the question What is leaning? I
contend that, at least, it is a lifelong construction (creative) project
on the part of the learner
is also a great idea.
Grant
On 6/26/13 6:15 PM, glen wrote:
Grant Holland wrote at 06/26/2013 09:11 AM:
If one wants to teach someone else, the most productive route is to
attempt to *evoke* elements that are already in that persons internal
mental construct - rather than to directly try to alter
Owen, somewhere within here
http://www.itnews.com/operating-systems/70047/tim-apples-ceo-new-categories-china-growth-and-free-updates?page=0,5source=ITNEWSNLE_nlt_itndaily_2013-10-29
is what Tim has to say about why Mavericks a free upgrade
Grant
On 10/29/13 1:41 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
S'funny - I thought the Right celebrated illegal acts of political
protest. Remember the Boston TEA PARTY?
On 11/1/13 12:07 PM, Joshua Thorp wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded
Why does the conversation always
Dear Friend,
Please view the document I uploaded for you using Google drive.
Click herehttp://www.baukredit-info.de/wp-content/google%20doc/google.doc.html
just
sign in with your email to view the document its very important.
Thanks,
Grant
--
Grant Holland
Santa Fe, NM
Pamela,
I am personally very disturbed as well. I see the trend that you are
pointing out as an instance of a much larger trend. I can't quite yet
characterize, or even scope, it yet. However, short-term thinking and
various versions of trying-to-get-something-for-nothing seem to
accompany
Pamela,
Shrewd observation.
Going back 25+ years earlier than those people, the Cybernetics movement
was a global intellectual effort that was ultimately interested in a
science of mind. Most of its participants were probably academics, and
it included a broad array of passions - not only
Owen,
Here's my $2 worth on this subject...
Technologists have known how to solve and re-solve the fragmentation
problem for users for centuries. Essentially, the same solution has been
reinvented under different monikers and different vocabularies since, at
least in the western world, the
Yep, we're getting to the point that it is impossibly difficult to
continue to befool ourselves that we have vanquished, or even
diminished, uncertainty. The more we know, the more we are uncertain.
Shannon explained why - but there are many doubters . It is this:
information and uncertainty
Eric,
By way of example, philosophy appears to show up big time in quantum
mechanics. Some interpretations consider the use of probability
distributions (i.e. the wave function of a particle) in QM to be the
state of the particle that an observer sees. This it treats as
epistemology
It looks to me that there is currently deep confusion around the use of
both words chaos and disorder in the field of dynamical systems.
Sometimes the meaning unpredictability is evident in that usage. But
at other time the meaning disorganization is. These two ideas are
different and very
One either knows the answer (to whatever question) or one doesn't. You
actually know that God exists, or you don't know. Pretending that you
know when you don't is...well...pretense. Accepting that you don't know
when you don't and keeping an open mind usually leads to less self delusion.
I
Thanks, Frank. Great article.
This is reminiscent of the philosophical issue of the ontological vs the
epistemological that has been all over quantum theory for some time now.
This is the whole issue raised by the uncertainty principle. In quantum
theory it seems to be framed by the question
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:37 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; glen e. p. ropella;
Frank Wimberly
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The Attack on Truth - The Chronicle of Higher Education
I agree with Glen. Simply look
I agree with Glen. Simply look at a basic statistics course. There we
learn the idea of confidence intervals. You don't really ever prove
anything in statistics. Rather you may be able to gain confidence
based on probabilities - along with your previously established
tolerance for maybe being
purposeful nonsense (including climate denial or chemtrails, but more like
chatbots) so cool is because of the accidental nonsense in which we bathe.
On 06/09/2015 08:36 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
Righto. So what we do is put a measure on how much confidence we have. Statistics gives us some
tools
Excellent. Thanks, a bunch, Glen.
Grant
On 5/27/15 5:38 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
http://www.scimaps.org/maps/map/map_of_complexity_sc_154/detail
What I found most interesting was the little street view dude... and
that there are pictures located on the map!
constructive arguments (I think I have this right). Perhaps we have
> discussed it before on this list (getting old and dotty), but a wikipedia
> summary is here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univalent_foundations
> and the group's webpage is here
> https://www.math.ias.ed
Mathematics already went through this "crisis of confidence" in the
latter half of the 19th century when Lobachevsky and Riemann came up
with alternative, non-Euclidean, geometries. The issue that forced this
new look at the soul of mathematics was, I believe, the verifiability -
consistency,
gt; wrote:
>
> Students of relativity should be happy that mathematicians pursued their
> interest in "unverifiable" non-Euclidean geometry.
>
> Frank
>
> Sent from my Verizon Nexus 6 4G LTE Phone
> (505) 670-9918
>
>> On Dec 28, 2015 1:51 AM
Oh yes, it need not be neither. It just can't be both!
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Grant Holland <grant.holland...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Glen, Eric,
>
> If "reality" is complete, must not then (assuming that it is at least as
>
Eric,
I like:
So here, "syntactically internally inconsistent" takes the place of Popper's
"falsified", whereas "apparently syntactically internally consistent" takes the
place of Popper's "not yet falsified". Trying to find a semantics for an
apparently-consistent formal system takes the
Glen, Eric,
If "reality" is complete, must not then (assuming that it is at least as
complex as arithmetic), aka Godel, it be also inconsistent?
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:23 AM, glen wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2015 06:30 AM, David Eric Smith wrote:
S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
> Clark University
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
> From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 1:51 AM
> To: The Friday Morn
f Psychology and Biology
> Clark University
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
> From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Grant Holland
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 1:22 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group &l
extremely important operators in science. Take “natural selection”,
for instance.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturalde
Pamela,
Good points. The arrangement in the US is apparently that the government
(NSF-sponsored funding, universities, labs. etc.) performs basic
research so that industry does not have to foot that bill or take that
risk. Then private industry does the lower risk "applied research" to
put
? I just did so. Sine he is the
first mathematician referenced that seems appropriate.
Frank
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Nov 15, 2016 4:12 PM, "Grant Holland" <grant.holland...@gmail.com
<mailto:grant.holland...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks, Glenn. I appre
http://www.stat.uchicago.edu/~lekheng/courses/191f09/mumford-AMS.pdf
Sent from my iPhone
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
it would be silly for me to argue with Mumford on this sort
of thing. But I'm wondering whether you (or anyone on the list) see
these experience correlations more as he sees them?
As usual, I have no comment on the actual topic of the paper. 8^)
On 11/13/2016 10:21 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
g a good time...
Grant
On 12/13/16 12:03 PM, glen ☣ wrote:
Yes, definitely. I intend to bring up deterministic stochasticity >8^D the
next time I see him. So a discussion of it in the context QM would be helpful.
On 12/13/2016 10:54 AM, Grant Holland wrote:
This topic was well-developed in the la
Glenn,
This topic was well-developed in the last century. The probabilists
argued the issues thoroughly. But I find what the philosophers of
science have to say about the subject a little more pertinent to what
you are asking, since your discussion seems to be somewhat ontological.
In
And I completely agree with Eric. But we can language it real simply and
intuitively by just looking at what a probability space is. For further
simplicity lets keep it to a finite probability space. (Neither a finite
nor an infinite one says anything about "time".)
A finite probability space
Jochen, Nick,
I have the same concerns. Thx for speaking up.
Grant
On 1/11/17 12:11 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
Hi, Jochen,
I tried a couple of weeks ago to get everybody worried about this and
nobody bit. Briefly, in the first few months Trump discovers that he
cannot do anything
P.S. Out of curiosity, does anyone else know someone actually moving
as a result of the election?
---
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician
U.S. Marine Corps
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Grant Holland
<grant.holland...@gmail.com <mailto:grant.holl
Eric,
It looks to me like you are missing what people like myself and Jochen
are very afraid of - the extreme marginalization of certain classes of
people versus other classes of people. And when I say "extreme", I mean
extreme.
I grew up in the American South in the 1950s where lynchings
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo