Hi all, been reading your latest.
Questions --
1) artificial intelligence -- do you agree with Hawkings that if we really
go forward on mega creating it that it will sort of take over and spin off
in dangerous ways as he talked about in his May 3rd press briefing?
2) Korea nuclear war -- Somehow,
re: Vol 173, Issue 19
to Frank Wimberly et al
I would argue that existence of correlation is then causative.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:00 AM, wrote:
> Send Friam mailing list submissions to
> friam@redfish.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
three left that place quietly, the gun lay in the dirt in the darkness,
waiting for better equations.
Pmmiller
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 31, 2019, at 8:45 AM, HighlandWindsLLC Miller
> wrote:
>
> “But in the light of the dead dark night, the two boys asked for a second
> c
To all and Nickolas:
Thus we must save the turtle. And where there is “of” there was also and always
“of not”.
Peggy M Miller
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 5:14 AM, friam-requ...@redfish.com wrote:
>
> Send Friam mailing list submissions to
>friam@redfish.com
>
> To subscribe or
Dave et al: I think 1 and 3 of your Turing machine apply. Peggy m Miller
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 4, 2019, at 10:00 AM, friam-requ...@redfish.com wrote:
>
> Send Friam mailing list submissions to
>friam@redfish.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
I appreciated the submission of the light photo experiment info!
Peggy M Miller
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 12:00 PM, friam-requ...@redfish.com wrote:
>
> Send Friam mailing list submissions to
>friam@redfish.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
“But in the light of the dead dark night, the two boys asked for a second
chance, shooting the policeman in the head, as she laughed uncontrollably at
their dusty remains.”
...Peggy m miller. ...happy Halloween!
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:06 PM, Nick Thompson
> wrote:
>
> “…
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 7, 2019, at 1:25 PM,
> wrote:
>
> Glen,
>
> Most streams of experience don't converge. Random streams predict nothing.
> They are of no use to the organism. Only streams that converge, "are". I.e,
> only they exist. Random streams, aren't. Most
Nick et al:
It seems that the convergence of interest is possibly not just the cards and
the marks, but the marker of the cards and whether they are at the table. So,
convergence of marker, cards, table, chairs, markee? Markees? Chips?
Are the chips also marked I must wonder? And the chairs?