Personally, I would very much prefer a single wiki.
I believe that users would have great difficulty in distinguishing
the various forks in a systematic way; they may not have
been the one to set up which ever variation was installed with
their working group.
Gene
On 4/21/2013 11:00 PM, Bill
Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAxiom.
The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
FriCAS appears to use boot code -- I assume,
On 22 April 2013 13:42, u1204 d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAxiom.
The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
source files reveals numerous references to
I am sorry, but changing variable names inside source code because of
a project fork seems incorrect to me. I think it would be both wrong
and even more confusing if FriCAS and OpenAxiom tried to give the
impression that they had no relation to each other and no relation at
all to the original
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] [fricas-devel] Re: trademarks
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:42:31 -0400
From: u1204 d...@axiom-developer.org
To: Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
CC: su...@attglobal.net, fricas-devel@googlegroups.com,
I have known about 'sed' for a long time;
but have had enough experience with global
change mechanisms to avoid them like the plague.
Cheers, Gene
On 4/22/2013 1:42 PM, u1204 wrote:
Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include
As far as I know no one is blocked from any lists. It seems that Tim
just prefers not to subscribe.
On 22 April 2013 19:52, Eugene Surowitz su...@attglobal.net wrote:
Certainly.
I am unhappy to see the notion of anyone being
blocked from any of the lists.
I have maintained a common mail
