It is sometimes useful to find the domain up in the hierarchy which
actually implements a particular function.
Can this be queried at runtime using some nasty Lisp or Boot tricks?
Say, I have a domain (or package) form like (Fraction S) and a
signature (SIGNATURE / (% % %)) and want to get back
The following program has a little bug.
--- foo.spad --
)abbrev package CONDOC ConstructorDocumentation
ConstructorDocumentation: with
getConstructors: () - CONSTRUCTORS
== add
getConstructors(): CONSTRUCTORS ==
cs: CONSTRUCTORS == empty()
f: TextFile :=
Is there some way to provide links to source code?
You mean like this?
http://www.hemmecke.de/fricas/html/BinaryTree.html
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
FriCAS - computer algebra system group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Yes that seems to work real nice. I like it!
Just a few questions/observations that perhaps you have already considered:
Maybe a slightly different layout would make the meaning of the link
to source code more obvious.
There are some red exports such as divide in NonNegativeInteger that
have
On 05/29/2014 10:01 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Maybe a slightly different layout would make the meaning of the link
to source code more obvious.
As I said, I don't yet know enough to do all the styling. I must first
learn how the standard theming is done with sphinx. I would like to just
add markup
On 05/29/2014 11:29 PM, Bill Page wrote:
I guess my first thought when seeing the red color was that
something was wrong.
Well... I guess, all that is a question of style and some link that
explains what certain colors stands for.
I appreciate feedback (in particular positive *smile*), but I'm
On 29 May 2014 18:38, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.org wrote:
On 05/29/2014 11:29 PM, Bill Page wrote:
I guess my first thought when seeing the red color was that
something was wrong.
Well... I guess, all that is a question of style and some link that
explains what certain colors stands for.
Oops.
On 29 May 2014 20:10, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
...
Of course what we see instead is
Complex: (R: CommutativeRing) :ComplexCategory(R)
That should have been
Complex(R: CommutativeRing) :ComplexCategory(R)
that is, without the initial : . This is the same
