oldk1331 wrote:
>
> First, thanks for your informative response, I learn a lot
> from it and other messages you posted before. I want
> to know if you can put "appropriate portion" of your mail
> into comments of source code, to document the limitation
> of current code, so people who stumble int
OK, I get it now. You can commit the parts you feel
comfortable, and I will following the standard in the
future.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
oldk1331 wrote:
>
> along with some improvements:
>
> 1. I changed local type abbreviation to avoid conflict:
> I changed "UP ==> SparseUnivariatePolynomial R"
> into "SUPR ==> SparseUnivariatePolynomial R",
> so that a spad expression "x::SUPR" can be copy & pasted
> into interpreter, easier for
oldk1331 wrote:
>
> So, this is how I summarize it:
>
> 1. Short patch, ready to commit: post it in mail.
>
> 2. Long patch, ready to commit: post in attachment or post
> with a link to the patch that can be directly downloaded.
>
> But if there a is a long patch (set) needs discussion and
> r
oldk1331 wrote:
>
> https://github.com/fricas/fricas/commit/9b62873dfb986f9b5f909254f31a0f4fa2b=
> 05421.patch
>
> fix symFunc to match its document
> fix TANEXP which depends on symFunc
Looks reasonable. However, I do not know why original authors
choose to mess with signs. AFAICS
to_vec
I find the trick Waldek describes quite amazing (never seen it before)
and I dare saying: forget about translating sage code ;)
Am 01.06.2016 um 10:33 schrieb Martin Baker:
> Kurt and Waldek,
>
> Thank you very much for your help, I was stuck but now I have a way
> forward.
>
> Martin B
>
> On
Am 01.06.2016 um 04:56 schrieb oldk1331:
> Yes, you are right, I've fixed symFunc to match its description.
>
> The next problem is to fix TANEXP accordingly, which I'll do
> later. But now is the problem of document it:
>
> Take tanPIa for example, tanPIa returns a FRAC SUPR,
> which has this p
Kurt and Waldek,
Thank you very much for your help, I was stuck but now I have a way forward.
Martin B
On 31/05/16 23:24, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Kurt Pagani wrote:
(11) -> completeSmith(A)$SMNF
(11)
+2 0 0 ++ 100 + +1 - 2 - 2+
|
