On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
On 12/05/2009 04:54 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
Waldek,
Since we have literate programming, I think your explanation would be
best put just next to your implementation. Can you commit that?
No!!! I _really_ do not
Waldek,
Since we have literate programming, I think your explanation would be
best put just next to your implementation. Can you commit that?
In the mailing list archive it will be just forgotten or relatively hard
to find if the code does not (at least) have a link to your message.
Anyway,
Waldek Hebisch hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl writes:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
Waldek,
Since we have literate programming, I think your explanation would be
best put just next to your implementation. Can you commit that?
No!!! I _really_ do not want to see such texts inside source
files. Such
Dear Waldek
thank you for the explanations on streams.
Incidentally I am working with streams too these days
(moments, Jacobi parameters and continued fractions)
and found this extremely helpful.
Also the recent comments on the spad compiler.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:54:52PM +0100, Waldek
On 12/05/2009 04:54 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
Waldek,
Since we have literate programming, I think your explanation would be
best put just next to your implementation. Can you commit that?
No!!! I _really_ do not want to see such texts inside source
files. Such for
Martuin Rubey asked about stmult routine which I recently
commited to 'sttaylor.spad'. I think the best explanation
is to give short reconstruction how the routine was
written.
1) Let us look first at general pattern of stream fortines. Good
example is the simpified version of 'map':
