Re: [fricas-devel] bug in radicalSolve caused by 50f391bc

2024-05-04 Thread Waldek Hebisch
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 08:29:29PM +0800, Qian Yun wrote: > I found this by accident, when comparing trunk book against > 1.3.10 book. > > In section 8.5.3 (page 316), there were 6 solutions. > > (1) -> radicalSolve([3*x^3+y+1,y^2-4],[x,y]) > >(1) [[x = - 1, y = 2], [x = - 1, y = 2]] > >

Re: [fricas-devel] bug in radicalSolve caused by 50f391bc

2024-05-04 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
First, thank you for taking care and finding this issue. When I recreated the book generation I also thought of this problem, but was too lazy to actually tackle it. There could be two solutions. I would prefer the second one. (a) For each command, add a testcase into the src/input

[fricas-devel] bug in radicalSolve caused by 50f391bc

2024-05-04 Thread Qian Yun
I found this by accident, when comparing trunk book against 1.3.10 book. In section 8.5.3 (page 316), there were 6 solutions. (1) -> radicalSolve([3*x^3+y+1,y^2-4],[x,y]) (1) [[x = - 1, y = 2], [x = - 1, y = 2]] Git bisect points to 50f391bc. This raises the question that how can