Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-04 Thread Kurt Pagani
Am 04.10.2016 um 15:03 schrieb oldk1331: >> I've been thinking of it frequently. From time to time I try to compile it >> using >> Mingw64 (x86_64 Msys) or even Cygwin64 (x86_64 Cygwin). > > How did that go? Not successful? > No, not successful at all. It begins with missing build type

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-04 Thread oldk1331
> I've been thinking of it frequently. From time to time I try to compile it > using > Mingw64 (x86_64 Msys) or even Cygwin64 (x86_64 Cygwin). How did that go? Not successful? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system"

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-03 Thread Kurt Pagani
Am 03.10.2016 um 09:53 schrieb oldk1331: > Kurt, off topic a little, what do you think of a 64bit windows binary? > I've been thinking of it frequently. From time to time I try to compile it using Mingw64 (x86_64 Msys) or even Cygwin64 (x86_64 Cygwin). Although the official cygwin32

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-03 Thread oldk1331
Kurt, off topic a little, what do you think of a 64bit windows binary? > I was beeing imprecise above: I mean: can this "Linux subsystem" call > native Windows binaries? I know that it can run most Linux binaries. > The point is if it is an isolated sandbox or if it integrates with > Windows?

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Kurt Pagani
Am 03.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Waldek Hebisch: > Kurt Pagani wrote: >> >> I enthusiastically installed the 64-bit Intel/AMD Linux binary in the first ... >> of much help to get Fricas running !? Or, by the way, do you think ABCL could >> ever be used to compile Fricas? > > I expect ABCL to be

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Waldek Hebisch
> > I've pushd a new release of the Windows installer (includes Fricas 1.3). It > works well on Windows 7,however, due to the "Console Improvements in > Windows 10" (google it if you like ;) the mingw version doesn't work > properly (more precisely: the system commands like ")quit" refuse to do >

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Waldek Hebisch
Kurt Pagani wrote: > > I enthusiastically installed the 64-bit Intel/AMD Linux binary in the first > place before recognizing that not a single Lisp disto will go. The error > messages seem to be unrelated at first sight, however, there might be a common > source (as you suggest below). The

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Kurt Pagani
I enthusiastically installed the 64-bit Intel/AMD Linux binary in the first place before recognizing that not a single Lisp disto will go. The error messages seem to be unrelated at first sight, however, there might be a common source (as you suggest below). >> >>

Re: [fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Waldek Hebisch
Kurt Pagani wrote: > > I've pushd a new release of the Windows installer (includes Fricas 1.3). It > works well on Windows 7,however, due to the "Console Improvements in > Windows 10" (google it if you like ;) the mingw version doesn't work > properly (more precisely: the system commands like

[fricas-devel] fricas_w32 : Hope for Windows 10 Users

2016-10-02 Thread Kurt Pagani
I've pushd a new release of the Windows installer (includes Fricas 1.3). It works well on Windows 7,however, due to the "Console Improvements in Windows 10" (google it if you like ;) the mingw version doesn't work properly (more precisely: the system commands like ")quit" refuse to do their job).