Sorry, I retract my feature suggestion because Union with selectors are there
also in Aldor and with more features that make such selectors more meaningful:
i.e. assignment via selector, like u := [num == 3].
RiCCardo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi,
if this is not the correct place for sending FricasUG fix requirements, please
excuse me and let me now.
RiCCardo
[FricasUG] FIXME: sec 2.5.2 "Union-s with selectors" pag 96
"Note that case uses the selector name as its right-hand argument. If you
accidentally use the branch
type on the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Ricardo made me aware that the formulations in
> http://fricas.github.io/book.pdf Section 5.3 maybe a bit confusing to
> new users.
>
> We all know that Void is the type used in situations where there is
> no value.
No that is not correct.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:22 PM, oldk1331 wrote:
>> However I am uncertain about your proposed changes to Void. Why do you
>> prefer a value of 0 instead of the symbol "()"? Note of course that
>> this is a Lisp symbol and not Lisp NIL. Although the value can be
>> anything, as the empty tuple,
