Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] )set message bottomup on which function signature is selected?

2018-07-26 Thread Riccardo GUIDA
Ralf wrote: Obviously, for the result, it wouldn't matter. Well, maybe obvious for you ... in absence of documentation and without reading the code I can imagine at least 3 ways of coercing x^10 + y -1 to a SparseUnivariatePolynomial(Exprression(Integer)): Calling ? the variable, (x^10+

Re: [fricas-devel] )set message bottomup on which function signature is selected?

2018-07-26 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Obviously, for the result, it wouldn't matter. But you could force calling a certain function by getting the argument types right explicitly. http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/FriCASHelpSet There is ")set output abbreviate off", but it wouldn't help for the signatures here. Ralf (1) -> pxy:=x

[fricas-devel] )set message bottomup on which function signature is selected?

2018-07-26 Thread Riccardo GUIDA
Hi! I'm using ')set message bottomup on' to understand coercitions and the selection of function signatures. (If you now a better way, please tell me). Problem: Which function is chosen when more then one choice is admissible? Eg: In the example below I understand that [1] and [2] at bottom a