Dear Johannes, thanks for the code. I think that 'array2'
constructor is fine addition. Concerning 'arrayMultiply',
I agree with Ralf and Bill that this does not fit very well
to existing structure. Probably best way would be to
allow more general matrices and have '+' in Matrix whenever
>> Why I would be against this extension is that TwoDimensionaArray
>> is a data structure domain, i.e., no algebraic operations.
>>
>> Your operations should live in an "algebraic" domain. But even
>> then I see problems, because + and * will be partial functions
>> (much as in Matrix(Matrix
Am 11.11.19 um 22:53 schrieb Ralf Hemmecke:
> On 11/4/19 11:24 PM, Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier privat wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have enhanved TwoDimensionalArray to include arithmetic for block
>> matrices and have an operation array2 (similar to matrix for Matrix) for
>> easy creation of
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 11/4/19 11:24 PM, Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier privat wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have enhanved TwoDimensionalArray to include arithmetic for block
> > matrices and have an operation array2 (similar to matrix for Matrix) for
> > easy
On 11/4/19 11:24 PM, Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier privat wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have enhanved TwoDimensionalArray to include arithmetic for block
> matrices and have an operation array2 (similar to matrix for Matrix) for
> easy creation of two-dimensional array and would suggest to include this
>
Hi all,
I have enhanved TwoDimensionalArray to include arithmetic for block
matrices and have an operation array2 (similar to matrix for Matrix) for
easy creation of
two-dimensional array and would suggest to include this into the next
version:
(1) -> )r array2-jg-test
A11 := matrix [[2]]
