On 06/11/2018 03:34 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> I think that we should not expose MathMLFormat, ScriptFormulaFormat,
> TexFormat and TexmacsFormat. AFAICS TexFormat1 has to be
> exposed to fulfil its role, so probably should be exposed.
Although my version of TexFormat can be used to adapt the
I agree.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Waldek Hebisch
wrote:
> I think that we should not expose MathMLFormat, ScriptFormulaFormat,
> TexFormat and TexmacsFormat. AFAICS TexFormat1 has to be
> exposed to fulfil its role, so probably should be exposed.
>
> Opinions?
>
> --
>
+1
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Waldek Hebisch
wrote:
> I think that we should not expose MathMLFormat, ScriptFormulaFormat,
> TexFormat and TexmacsFormat. AFAICS TexFormat1 has to be
> exposed to fulfil its role, so probably should be exposed.
>
> Opinions?
>
> --
>
I think that we should not expose MathMLFormat, ScriptFormulaFormat,
TexFormat and TexmacsFormat. AFAICS TexFormat1 has to be
exposed to fulfil its role, so probably should be exposed.
Opinions?
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are