Re: [fricas-devel] [PATCH] add a new interface for partialFraction; doc fix

2016-10-18 Thread oldk1331 
Any update on this patch?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:58 PM, oldk1331  wrote:
> A little more misc fixes and improvements for pfr.spad:
>
> https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/57f913c588bbdb970f50305ccb72e912586fcb2b.patch
>
> It's not included in the patch, but maybe it's better to replace
> "nil()" with "[]"?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [fricas-devel] [PATCH] add a new interface for partialFraction; doc fix

2016-10-13 Thread oldk1331 
A little more misc fixes and improvements for pfr.spad:

https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/57f913c588bbdb970f50305ccb72e912586fcb2b.patch

It's not included in the patch, but maybe it's better to replace
"nil()" with "[]"?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [fricas-devel] [PATCH] add a new interface for partialFraction; doc fix

2016-10-12 Thread oldk1331 
Updated patch:

https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/b0fb558ecee4b387d45b7c210841003ebc832bb6.patch

> It seems that we can add new funtion directly to PartialFraction,
> without creating a new package.

Fixed.

> I am doing such things in lazy way: if looking at code there
> may be doubt about types of paramenters

Those global type declarations are mainly for coerce and *,
which are heavily overloaded.  So I think add type declaration
for each function is better.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [fricas-devel] [PATCH] add a new interface for partialFraction; doc fix

2016-10-12 Thread Waldek Hebisch 
oldk1331 wrote:
> 
> https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/a7e1be2d9bbf176d8b97aa0e4d8d382417ada1b6.patch

It seems that we can add new funtion directly to PartialFraction,
without creating a new package.

> 
> 
> Futhermore, I want to remove the "global type declaration"
> of a,b,r,n in PartialFraction, opinions?

I am doing such things in lazy way: if looking at code there
may be doubt about types of paramenters, then I add explicit
parmmeter declarations.  If after that global declarations
are no longer used, then I remove them.

-- 
  Waldek Hebisch

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.