Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread CSÉCSY László
2008. január 22. dátummal Miklos Vajna ezt írta: hi, Re! here are possible solutions: 1) do nothing and wait till somebody claims about it 2) duplicate the LICENSE, etc. files in each subpkgs (this is what Debian does iirc) 3) create a separate -docs subpkg for these files (i think this is

Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread Gabriel C
Miklos Vajna wrote: hi, Hey :) here is an issue: we do some automated aggregation for documentation (README, LICENSE, AUTHORS and other files) for packages, but in case there are subpackages, these always go to the main pkg, so there will be even no LICENSE file in subpkgs. this may or

Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:01:55PM +0100, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact I don't like that as well but we have to do something about. I think we could do in fact 2 and 3 and let the developer decide in what way he want provide the LICENSE files for such packages. E.g: add a new

[Frugalware-devel] bts assignees

2008-01-22 Thread VOROSKOI Andras
Hi devels, mom, dad... I used to assign sec tasks to myself but after a while I realized that it makes my work harder. I can hardly separate security related issues from my other bugs and it's bad. I can simply keep track with sec issues thanks to the [SEC] prefix, the assign is useless. So

Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:22:18PM +0100, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm I don't really like this =) When we want to force that then we should force for all packages. or even that. but in that case we should decide what should be the format. for example we could create a collection

Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread Gabriel C
Miklos Vajna wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:22:18PM +0100, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm I don't really like this =) When we want to force that then we should force for all packages. or even that. but in that case we should decide what should be the format. for example we

Re: [Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

2008-01-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:45:09PM +0100, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for example we could create a collection of licences, like: /usr/share/licences/foo /usr/share/licences/bar Sounds logical :) then use license=('foo') in the FrugalBuild? I think that could work :)

[Frugalware-devel] freeze plan for 0.8rc1

2008-01-22 Thread Miklos Vajna
hi, something like: - jan 24 evening: latest release bumps - jan 25 evening: upload snapshot net,cd1-2 isos to -current-iso for testing - jan 26 evening: update -testing - jan 27 evening: final upload of the release isos - jan 29 morning: release okay? i expect this time a pretty smooth