And
apparently there is a free software program unar [3] that can replace
the unrar part.
unar and lsar have a different interface than unrar (or unrar-free) used
by GUI archivers. On Parabola GNU/Linux-libre a script called ununrar
is used to call unar with appropriate arguments and print
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
evince only 'Suggests' unrar, so it at least won't get installed
automatically; although you're right, why is it doing that. Please
file a bug report requesting that the unrar suggests be replaced by
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, John Sullivan wrote:
Where is this contesting happening?
First I noticed was the clamav bug I mentioned earlier in the thread.
I also started a private thread between the RAR folks and The
Unarchiver author that was CCed
Hello Bryan,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:42:03PM -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
I think it makes sense to remove both the unrar and rar nonfree programs
from the nonfree repo in either Wheezy or Wheezy+1. If not, we should
investigate why so many users are installing unrar/rar. Unrar has a
Op 17-10-12 22:42, Bryan Quigley schreef:
Hi All,
Continuing my attempt to find non-free programs that we no longer need
unrar/rar came to my attention. It's some of the most popular
installed non-free packages in both Debian [1
http://popcon.debian.org/non-free/by_inst] and Ubuntu [2
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
As far as I'm concerned the unrar-nonfree package is kept since the free
software replacement is not fully functional in all cases. For instance, if I
recall correctly the free one doesn't handle rar files with passwords very
well.
Are
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:53:06AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
This issue is preventing clamav folks from using unar code
https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2907
That is some peculiar reasoning.
___
Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list
