On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Peter B. Harvey (Information Security) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This virus at the time of my posting this is only detedted by
> Kasperski and I cannot find any detail on the virus. Came in the
> email as given below.
>
> URL for the virus http://www.alias-search.com/images/msits.e
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:57:51PM -0500, Ron wrote:
> Haha nice, I was just getting ready to run it on my sacrificial VMWare
> box, but you saved me the trouble of hitting "undo" :-)
>
> Kurt Seifried wrote:
> > This is a trojan that will nuke all the files owned by the user running it.
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
This virus at the time of my posting this is only detedted by
Kasperski and I cannot find any detail on the virus. Came in the
email as given below.
URL for the virus http://www.alias-search.com/images/msits.exe
Also found was the following
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:37:34 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
> Technica Forensis wrote:
> >>CAUTION:
> >>Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves
> >>the
> >>right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.
The crucial word ---^^^
> > Kohl
Haha nice, I was just getting ready to run it on my sacrificial VMWare
box, but you saved me the trouble of hitting "undo" :-)
Kurt Seifried wrote:
> This is a trojan that will nuke all the files owned by the user running it.
>
> -Kurt
>
> - Original Message - From: "Esler, Joel - Contra
> > can someone send me the famous Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation ??
> > please..
> > my mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WTF? Just what kind of lazy, stupid, IGNORANT motherfucker are you? Go
spend 15 seconds of YOUR OWN FUCKING TIME, and FETCH IT YOURSELF.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[
you can find it here
http://www.cryptome.org/
On 8/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi to all
>
> can someone send me the famous Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation ??
> please..
> my mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> __
Technica Forensis wrote:
CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the
right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.
Kohl's owns the Internet?
Kohl's reserves the right to read my email I send my mom just because
it's on the
> CAUTION:
> Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves
> the
> right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.
Kohl's owns the Internet?
Kohl's reserves the right to read my email I send my mom just because
it's on the Internet?
maybe you
This message contains a digitally signed email which can be read by opening the attachment.
The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee.
Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by an
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200508-02
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - -
Just curious -- if the April patch fixed the vulnerability discussed, then that would mean (according to Cisco) that the vulnerability affected IPV6 and not IPV4, correct?
On 8/1/05, byte_jump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my opinion, probably the grossest error made by Cisco in all ofthis was
In my opinion, probably the grossest error made by Cisco in all of
this was silently patching their IOS back in April. Anyone who's ever
used Cisco's software knows that you can never run the latest release,
unless you want things to break, and break badly. As a result, how
many organizations were
anyone got the new cindy_nip_slip.rar with that blurry nip slip?
OMFG d00d itz 2lm0st lik3 sh3 1z da [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anyone getting a K:D ratio of 75%?? Damn my new razer mouse is
p0wning with an awp...
Anyone got links to the l33t chinese h4x0rz websites?
D to da motha fuckin r to da 3 be
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 11:59 -0700, Daniel Sichel wrote:
> There are still a few people there who have their heads screwed on
> right. Of course finding them can be a challenge
Mike Schiffman being one of them. I wonder what his take is on this.
Curious,
Frank
--
Blackhatgate: Shame on C
> Or perhaps Cisco
> has already finished its transformation to the modern kind of bussines
and
> got rid of anyone with a clue?
There are still a few people there who have their heads screwed on
right. Of course finding them can be a challenge
Hurrah for the global economy, the largest expo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurs to me that your solution is flawed as well. What assurance do
we have that your "protected storage" is future-proof (i.e. unbreachable
by an means whatsoever)?
It doesn't have to be unbreachable by any means whatsoever, it has to be
unbreachable from a remo
If you have physical access - Try BartPE
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, at 06:37AM, Paul Farrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yup after I posted that I read your post, have to admit, searching a
>table full of hashes would be a hell of alot quicker than cracking it
>manually :]
>But then again, I ra
Just search http and https on google, that will tell you the answer :)
--
Regards,
Nuno Cruz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bug Traq
Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Agosto de 2005 16:26
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-di
Hate having to explain a joke, but...
It's a usenet joke referring to "me too!" lamers. Search Google Groups.
John
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:45:04AM -0500, milw0rm Inc. wrote:
> You must actually be on the Cindy Crawford mailing list then? lmfao.
>
> /str0ke
>
> On 8/1/05, John Kinsella <[E
Ahh, good call!
On 8/1/05, Steve Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:26:27AM -0400, Bug Traq wrote:
> > Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
> > http://https/;//gmail.google.com
> >
> > Anyone know why?
>
> You get the same thing when yo
On Monday 01 August 2005 17:42, Bug Traq wrote:
> Doesn't work in IE though
No, but you were talking about Firefox in your original posting. And besides:
more and more Average Joes are starting to use Firefox. Now the amount of
Firefox users is growing, more and more exploits will surface target
You must actually be on the Cindy Crawford mailing list then? lmfao.
/str0ke
On 8/1/05, John Kinsella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is getting like the Cindy Crawford mailing list...
>
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:55:02PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hi to all
> >
> > can someone sen
Doesn't work in IE though
On 8/1/05, Vincent van Scherpenseel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 17:26, Bug Traq wrote:
> > Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
> > http://https/;//gmail.google.com
> >
> > Anyone know why?
>
> Yes, Firefox uses
On Monday 01 August 2005 17:26, Bug Traq wrote:
> Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
> http://https/;//gmail.google.com
>
> Anyone know why?
Yes, Firefox uses Google's "I'm feeling lucky" feature to redirect users who
enter a word in the address bar which does n
> Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
> http://https/;//gmail.google.com
>
> Anyone know why?
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and spons
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:26:27AM -0400, Bug Traq wrote:
> Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
> http://https/;//gmail.google.com
>
> Anyone know why?
You get the same thing when you enter just
https
and it's because www.paypal.com is the first Google
Paste this URL in a firefox browser address bar and see what happens.
http://https/;//gmail.google.com
Anyone know why?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/29/2005 09:28:31 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:02:51 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
> >>redesign, fundamentally, the turing machine so that before each
> >>operation is performed a verification step is employed to ensure that
> >
> > Ahem. N
This is getting like the Cindy Crawford mailing list...
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:55:02PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi to all
>
> can someone send me the famous Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation ??
> please..
> my mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> __
Hack In The Box is pleased to inform you that *HACK IN
THE BOX SECURITY CONFERENCE* is back for the 5th time
in our series! After our first ever security
conference in the Middle East we cordially invite you
to sign up for the biggest conference in our series
yet! *HITBSecConf2005 - Malaysia* will
http://www.milw0rm.com/sploits/lynn-cisco.pdf
/str0ke
On 8/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> you didn't search a lot , do you know of google ? because I'm not
> sure fd is owning the searching market :>
>
> http://www.google
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
you didn't search a lot , do you know of google ? because I'm not
sure fd is owning the searching market :>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=lynn+cisco+pdf
At 14:55 01/08/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi to all
can someone send me the fa
hi to all
can someone send me the famous Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation ??
please..
my mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored
* Dinis Cruz:
> Is the Java Sandbox able to create outgoing connections on ports like 445?
>
> Also, even if it is possible, if a service like MS-SQL is already binded
> to 1433, then wouldn't an error be thrown saying something like 'Port
> already in use'.
This doesn't matter because in the P
I was just learning about sql injection and it's blind recall, and I have some
questions:
With the sentence " and MID($$$FIELD$$$,1,1) like CHAR(37) " and some
bruteforce I went through php's special chars protection and was able to get
thinks like:
http://www.phrack.org/author.php?a=290
===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-159-1August 01, 2005
unzip vulnerability
CAN-2005-0602
===
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubuntu 4.10 (Warty Warthog)
===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-158-1August 01, 2005
gzip vulnerability
CAN-2005-0758
===
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubuntu 4.10 (Warty Warthog)
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2005 17:19 schrieb DAN MORRILL:
> Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data
> has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data
> will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).
>
> If data is sent in error that does not li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 771-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
August 1st, 2005
==
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-157-1 August 01, 2005
mozilla-thunderbird vulnerabilities
CAN-2005-0989, CAN-2005-1159, CAN-2005-1160, CAN-2005-1532,
CAN-2005-2261, CAN-2005-2265, CAN-2005-2269, CAN-2005-2270,
CAN-2005-2353
===
Is the Java Sandbox able to create outgoing connections on ports like 445?
Also, even if it is possible, if a service like MS-SQL is already binded
to 1433, then wouldn't an error be thrown saying something like 'Port
already in use'.
That said, this is a very interesting concept, and a real
Surely this is a hoax?
Dinis Cruz
.Net Security Consultant
Phrack Staff wrote:
[-]=[-]
+++
=: P H R A C K - R E B O R N :=
Summary:
Buffer overflow in BusinessMail email server system 4.60.00
(http://www.netcplus.com/)
Details:
Input to the SMTP HELO and MAIL FROM: commands is not properly checked
and/or filtered. Issuing a long argument to the HELO and MAIL FROM:
commands will cause the corresponding process to die.
44 matches
Mail list logo
