On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Jason Coombs wrote:
> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:49:35 +1300
> From: Jason Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: J.A. Terranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Full-Disclosure
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] blocking Google Desktop
>
> J.A. Terranson wrote:
> > Invite the idiot in the
Alo Folks, does anyone have info, links, docs and tools to testing 3G technology ?
does anyone have experience to do pent-testing, PoC,? like sniffing traffic, tricks to hack the card (pcmcia) something like that?
I have a card 3g Kyocerera PCMCIA broadband over Linux, so i want to test the
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 16:10 +, Andrew Smith wrote:
> I'm considering trying to get some CISCO Certifications in the future,
> but can't really afford the training.
> I know a few people with certifications and they're willing to lend me
> their books and some training material they have, assum
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Go to HR, explain that the new security policy about not running Google
Desktop is make-or-break and explain why. To achieve this you may need
higher-level management buy-in, so hopefully you can threaten exposure
under HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley or some s
On 2/11/2006 7:03 PM +0100, J.A. Terranson wrote:
Yeah but typically lists and whatnot these days require confirmation,
Google just blindly subscribes you when anyone requests it, I'm
assuming, since I didn't subscribe to any of the hacker or porn groups
I have to keep removing myself from. Fran
I Found an XSS Vulnerability in PlaySmS
Site:
playsms.sourceforge.net
PoC:
www.target.com/playsms/index.php?err=
gboyce wrote:
> As a computer user, I certainly do have this choice. I'm certainly not
> going to install Google Desktop. In fact, I generally don't run Windows,
> so I don't even have the OPTIOn of running Google Desktop.
>
> This new "feature" still worries me though, and I want to find out h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
- RS-Labs Security Advisory -
===
Tittle: Multiple flaws in VHCS 2.x
ID: RS-2006-1
Severity: Critical
Date: 11.Feb.2006
Author: Román M
I am looking for a security contact for RR Donnelley & Sons. I have tried security, secure, & [EMAIL PROTECTED] but no response.
TIA,
T/E
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If yo
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Stan Bubrouski wrote:
> Yeah but typically lists and whatnot these days require confirmation,
> Google just blindly subscribes you when anyone requests it, I'm
> assuming, since I didn't subscribe to any of the hacker or porn groups
> I have to keep removing myself from. Fra
On 2/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:32:43 EST, Stan Bubrouski said:
> > you up for groups you don't want to be in, your messages get posted to
> > Google groups without your permission, along with your code etc...
>
> Messages and code being reposted is
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:32:43 EST, Stan Bubrouski said:
> you up for groups you don't want to be in, your messages get posted to
> Google groups without your permission, along with your code etc...
Messages and code being reposted is hardly a Google-specific problem.
It's a potential problem *anyt
Does anyone know any way to not allow people's to add you to google
groups or just extricate yourself from it all-together? I mean
honestly its more than just a little intrusive, people constantly sign
you up for groups you don't want to be in, your messages get posted to
Google groups without you
Joshua Levitsky wrote:
> Sorry, but explain? You mean something beyond the index of your
> personal data then? Did they add something beyond that?
>
> -Josh
It apparently stores your actual files now so you can search your desktop
on one pc from your desktop on another pc.
http://desktop.googl
I was added to this group without permission as well.
-sb
On 2/11/06, Adam Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that with all the resources at Google's
> disposal, they are unable to find technicians or project managers,
> designers, or whatever, that have any idea how th
Hey folks thanks to GSO guys i found the following about my website -
> :) Hi folks... one day i social engineered a password out by phishing and
>
> look what i
> got. And when i entered the chatrooms.. woah! it was full of great hackers!
> All you must
> check out. It might work for limite
I find it hard to believe that with all the resources at Google's
disposal, they are unable to find technicians or project managers,
designers, or whatever, that have any idea how the interweb works...
Amazingly, despite years of SPAM being a huge problem, they have now
created a system that al
Andrew Smith wrote:
I know a few people with certifications and they're willing to lend me
their books and some training material they have, assuming it's possible
to pass an exam without training is it possible to simply sit the exam?
I'm in the UK here, and I can't seem to find anywhere that I
Hey,Might not be the best place to ask this, but I couldn't find anywhere more relevant.I'm considering trying to get some CISCO Certifications in the future, but can't really afford the training.I know a few people with certifications and they're willing to lend me their books and some training ma
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, J.A. Terranson wrote:
Yes boys and girls, it is not safe to hand your mission critical data to
ANY third party.
If your data is sensitive, keep it home.
If you don't like Google's email "features", you have a choice you know.
(Hint: GO SOMEWHERE ELSE!)
Yes, it re
Hand j.a. a cup or coffee
Randall M
[-Original Message-
[From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
[Of J.A. Terranson
[Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 2:10 AM
[To: Full-Disclosure
[Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] blocking Google Desktop
[
[
[
[On Fri, 10 Feb 2
Are you all referring to this:
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2150094/google-connects-desktop-search
You keep saying version 4, but we are at 3. The above just places google in
the low in file swaping realm. This scares me for security reasons.
Thank You
Randall M
=
"
===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-247-1 February 10, 2006
heimdal vulnerability
CVE-2006-0582
===
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubuntu 4.10 (Warty Wartho
J.A. Terranson wrote:
Invite the idiot in the
white house, I hear he's feeling unloved today :-)
Do you mean: "invite the idiot" in the white house ?
Or do you mean: invite the "idiot in the white house" ?
My favorite stupid hacker trick "in the white house": getting POTUS to
call you by you
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Line Noise wrote:
> I'm still trying to help them understand why stuffing a "Chat"
> (mis)feature into gmail is a problem. No way to turn it off, and each
> account that gets it, starts up with it enabled. Oh, boy, I really
> want the world to know when I'm "on line" (especi
25 matches
Mail list logo
