Before asking others to learn reading, learn writing yourself.
By the way, just a hint concerning this whole thread: maybe if you first
start by understanding very well what you want to explain, it will sure
become much easier.
So you shouldn't blame others for the consequences of your own lacks.
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Nowadays the big, noisy, obvious, own the net type outbreak of
yesteryear is not the model of choice for your typical cyber-thug (you
know, those running virtually all malware these days)..
In fact, _avoiding_ exactly that is pretty much top of
Nowadays the big, noisy, obvious, own the net type outbreak of
yesteryear is not the model of choice for your typical cyber-thug (you
know, those running virtually all malware these days)..
In fact, _avoiding_ exactly that is pretty much top of their list of
desiderata.
How do we
[Archival purpose]
Author: Bipin Gautam (All Rights Reserved, Research Paper, 1'st DRAFT)
___
Background:
Any doctrine or philosophy is complete on its own rights. But, if we
start from this angle, anyone can defend anything out of anything.
Paradox are way of life... Hence,
Paradox are way of life... Hence, the goal here is to question every
knowledge with reasoning and trying-not to build a static opinion on
anything.
But have you tried contacting the vendor first?
/mz
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Fractal fractal fractal, even us that coined the concept can't keep it going
forever.
Seems evident that each subsystem looses key aspects of its parent, this
might turn out to be a system flaw, or a constrained space.
We might have discovered this flaw already and we might have been using all
I'm not sure why you insist on continuing this, but you're not really
helping your case.
The bottom line is that it's an intentional feature. That is why it A)
consistently works and B) works across most mail clients.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:46 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- sec...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not sure how you can keep insisting that it's not a feature when it's
clearly been shown to be one. You either need to pay more attention, or get
a better dictionary.
What you're describing is possible directly through the anchor/link feature.
Even if it weren't, you could just as easily
Haha, holy mother of...
-=Glowing Dumb=- made my day... To be honest, he made my whole week.
Adam, I can't thank you enough for CCing the list.
2011/6/12 adam a...@papsy.net
I'm not sure how you can keep insisting that it's not a feature when it's
clearly been shown to be one. You either
LOL, it contains [rendered] HTML code but you're telling us that it's
plain-text?
In case you missed it, here are *your* email headers:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:32 AM, -= Glowing Doom =-
That about sums it up, although he unsubscribed from the list so I've CC'd
him.
If you're bored, look at the quoted conversation below. He went into a
complete nerd rage after unsubscribing, all because we wouldn't take his *
exploit* seriously.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:01 AM, ghost
It's really kinda sad that you're *still* going. There are thousands of *
features* in all kinds of software that *can* be exploited, but that doesn't
mean the feature itself was completely unintentional. You were originally
describing anchor text and now you're simply describing multi-line anchor
You do realize you're still going to be CC'd, don't you?http://www.google.com/
And OH MY GOD, my text somehow became a clickable link. Did you guys see
that? Did you see my ground breaking exploit? I demand your respect right
this second!@
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:13 PM, -= Glowing Doom =-
You got me, my session ID *is 1234567. *Please don't steal money out of my
bank account.
The only part that I'll bother replying to is what a *joke this list is*.
It's so much of a joke that you not only subscribed once, but TWICE.
That speaks volumes about you :D
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:52
Baseless assumption is baseless. While you're breaking stuff in your
mother's basement, I'm making a living. I've *opted* to reply to these
emails because it's free amusement.
Why are you so upset anyway? The world isn't going to end just because you
thought a feature was a bug.
On Sun, Jun 12,
#1 - No one has replied since I reproduced your proof of concept.
#2 - Even if they had, you're replying directly to me - not the list.
#3 - None of that is necessary. Type in text, highlight it and then click
the anchor/link icon. From there, you can insert the target URL (and use the
text of
So much for that Ryan guy editing secn3t's emails. He *just* sent me this
because he's completely upset over his major exploit turning out to be a
simple feature :(
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- sec...@gmail.comwrote:
Only took you , what 15 flame emails and, i have
17 matches
Mail list logo
