On 30 March 2011 21:53, Peter Osterberg j...@vel.nu wrote:
Risk would be a lot higher than 10 percent if it was, say, 300 years since
the last tsunami
Time to go back to school. Or, perhaps you'd like to come play at my casino...
___
On 25 February 2011 18:52, Maksymilian Arciemowicz
c...@securityreason.com wrote:
Chris Evans scarybeasts at gmail.com writes:
Linux distribution might still have vulnerabilities in this area.
proftpd use gnu libc implementation
http://www.proftpd.org/docs/RELEASE_NOTES-1.3.4rc1
+ Updated
On 23 December 2010 13:54, The Sp3ctacle sp3cta...@gmail.com wrote:
It shouldn't be that hard to bindiff the code compiled with with the
shipped compiler with the code from a compiler that predates the
latest backdoor shenanigans. You could decompile the binary code and
then ask a
On 16 December 2010 09:50, Larry Seltzer la...@larryseltzer.com wrote:
Has anyone read this yet?
http://www.downspout.org/?q=node/3
Seems IPSEC might have a back door written into it by the FBI?
Surely the thing to do now is not to audit *your own* OpenBSD code, but to
audit the OpenBSD
On 15 December 2010 12:05, musnt live musntl...@gmail.com wrote:
Original e-mail is from Theo DeRaadt
Is my question: Why is now Theo cower like rat. Is because his
stance from the beginning: we is audit everything for make me
believe Theo was is also on the payroll. Enjoy everyone.
I have
