Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-16 Thread M Kirschbaum
Gynvael Coldwind,   What Alfred has reiterated is that this is a security vulnerability irrelevantly of whether it qualifies for credit.   It is an unusual one, but still a security vulnerability. Anyone who says otherwise is blind, has little or no experience in hands on security, or either  ha

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread M Kirschbaum
Dear Mario,   There is nothing to gain being on either side. I have already read the thread replies by M. Zalewski. I believe Google is false and does not honor the security community.  Rgds, M. Kirschbaum           On Saturday, 15 March 2014, 11:11, Mario Vilas wrote: I believe

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread M Kirschbaum
for filing potential threats by name and bank details.   Rgds, M. Kirschbaum ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread M Kirschbaum
The thread starter is right about this. It is a vulnerability, and I think Google should start considering this.   The JSON service responds to GET requests , and there is a good chance that the service is also vulnerable to JSON Hijacking attacks.   As a professional penetration tester , I belie