Anders B Jansson wrote:
> Od Orf wrote:
>
>> On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts
>> which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and
>> whitelists of content keywords. I've found these to be ineffective in
>>
> Just filter out all messages with th
stop living.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:36 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Simpson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think the old girl is going to last very much longer.
>> At a guess i would think that he will have large rent arrears and is
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Simpson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the old girl is going to last very much longer.
> At a guess i would think that he will have large rent arrears and is
> probably spending his money on alcohol rather than food so the end
> can't be long.
>
On 9/16/08, Tonnerre Lombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Salut, Od,
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:45:51 +0100, Od Orf wrote:
> > On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts
> > which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and
> > whitelists of content keywords. I'v
Salut, Od,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:45:51 +0100, Od Orf wrote:
> On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts
> which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and
> whitelists of content keywords. I've found these to be ineffective in
> so much as either filtering th
22
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD
I dunno, lately it is going beyond amusing and straight past the 90% mark of
"distractions / useless garbage / possibly imbalanced ramblings" . might be
time to fire up
Anders B Jansson wrote:
> Od Orf wrote:
>> On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts
>> which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and
>> whitelists of content keywords. I've found these to be ineffective in
> Just filter out all messages with the phrase "n3t
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> A chick on F-D, no way, pics or GTFO!
http://xkcd.com/322/
please note that egregious situations may warrant exceptional EIRP* in
the direction of the target sufficient to prevent any future
contamination of the gene pool
> They should thank me I keep to the same keyword, I could be a
> terrorist and randomize my alias for every post, then you guys would
> be fucked. HAHAHAHA.
>
That's not funny.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/f
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Nicola Del Vacchio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nicola
>
A chick on F-D, no way, pics or GTFO!
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored
nt: Monday, September 15, 2008 4:38 PM
To: Od Orf
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD
I would never think of filtering FD, the colorful comments are what make
this list classic! Filtering it out would be a tragedy and a cri
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Anders B Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just filter out all messages with the phrase "n3td3v" in adress, subject or
> body and you'll get very close to a functional FD list.
>
> A large majority of the noise is either from, replying to or mentioning that
> k
No way!
The list is effective because it is unmoderated, full stop.
btw the only filter I apply is to trash NetD4v (all messages containing that
lame word).
nicola
2008/9/15 Stack Smasher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I would never think of filtering FD, the colorful comments are what make
> this list
Od Orf wrote:
> On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts
> which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and
> whitelists of content keywords. I've found these to be ineffective in
Just filter out all messages with the phrase "n3td3v" in adress, subject or
body
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:56:47 BST, n3td3v said:
> If you filter FD, the terrorists might be missed out by accident!!! Is
> that a risk you can take post-9/11???
If you're doing *actual* threat analysis, the risk that a *credible* threat
will be pre-announced on the F-D list (as opposed to wannabes
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Stack Smasher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would never think of filtering FD, the colorful comments are what make
> this list classic! Filtering it out would be a tragedy and a crime against
> humanity.
>
If you filter FD, the terrorists might be missed out by ac
I would never think of filtering FD, the colorful comments are what make
this list classic! Filtering it out would be a tragedy and a crime against
humanity.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Od Orf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I've been reading Full Disclosure for quite some ti
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Razi Shaban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you didn't notice, but he was talking about people like you.
>
Was he, omg, no really???
9/11
Call the cops!!!
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://li
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Od Orf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Failure to stay within clearly defined boundaries carries a penalty,
> such as a child time-out (naughty-chair) where the child is removed to
> an area where they are unable to participate but can observe the
> continuation of nor
Dear All,
I've been reading Full Disclosure for quite some time and, for the
most part, value the content I find here. It helps me with my work
and helps me keep abreast of developments in the wonderful worlds of
network and application security.
In this post, I seek to spark some discussion as
20 matches
Mail list logo
