I agree this is a discussion worth having. I think the policy should be
more objective to give us a clear policy to abide by and enforce.
Suggestions for policy:
1)No tool announcements.
Best rational I can think of for this one: Tool announcments should go
to the specific group they are for.
Just keep that simple, the post hit the non acceptable content.
Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden.
My opinion, but if the product could be free, like it was, then I
don't mind seeing those kind of post, but for anything commercial FD
is not there
I agree with Steve. I joined this list for learning about the latest security
vulnerabilities. It is a great method of staying current with everything going
on in the IT Sec world. I think I can speak for some people saying we did not
join to have a free but donation required tool promoted
2)Only announcements for OSI approved projects. Webappsec has this
policy I think, and it rewards people who share the most openly.
I would argue that something like this is the best for full
disclosure. Afterall, if you release a tool, your techniques are not
really fully disclosed if you
On 04/12/2011 09:04 AM, phil wrote:
Just keep that simple, the post hit the non acceptable content.
Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is
forbidden.
My opinion, but if the product could be free, like it was, then I don't
mind seeing those kind of post, but
What to do about it? It's not moderated?
Just ignore stuff and use the often used key called delete. Simple as that
=)
// rancor
Den 12 apr 2011 21.16 skrev Steve Pinkham steve.pink...@gmail.com:
On 04/12/2011 09:04 AM, phil wrote:
Just keep that simple, the post hit the non acceptable
...@gmail.com
To: Steve Pinkham steve.pink...@gmail.com
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:50:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Announcement posts and the charter (was Re:
INSECT Pro 2.5.1 released)
What to do about it? It's not moderated
It's whatever, un-moderated means exactly that. No-one can tell anyone else
what to release/write. Period.
Of course you can. That's what the charter is for. Unmoderated means
simply that the charter is usually not proactively enforced (but even
that is hardly an absolute guarantee).
/mz
I agree, un-moderated doesn't mean that people can't be banned for breaking
the rules or being a troll...
Pete
On 13 April 2011 06:35, Michal Zalewski lcam...@coredump.cx wrote:
It's whatever, un-moderated means exactly that. No-one can tell anyone
else what to release/write. Period.
Of
On Tuesday 12 Apr 2011, Steven Pinkham wrote:
[snip]
2)Only announcements for OSI approved projects. Webappsec has this
policy I think, and it rewards people who share the most openly.
OSI doesn't approve projects, only licences. I presume you mean Only
announcements for projects released
10 matches
Mail list logo
