Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-21 Thread Michel Pereira
And everyone are not good on to protect their systems. Bye On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) < li...@infosecurity.ch> wrote: > I just wanted to make a couple of consideration about Lulzsec, without > special reason, just because it's crossing to my mind. > > a) They ar

Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread coderman
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:40 AM, wrote: > ... > ugay its all for lulz u jelly? sounds like some are. "The Lulz Boat is at the forefront of the lizard battle fleet. Board your vessels and follow us into war; welcome to anti-security. #antisec" "Operation Anti-Security is in effect. Join the fle

Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread Michele Orru
Ciao Fabio ;-) I understand your point of view, and for sure they are using 80% of the time SQLi as the main attack vector to deface website/stealing data/whatever, but not always. I'm quite sure they used some 0-days when they completely compromised some of

Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
Nothing personal, that's exactly what i wrote previously: >> If they're IRC warriors within some time they will just disappear. >> Just think, the leaders before or later will start finding the >> game boring, will get a girlfriend, will start going out with friends >> rather than being twitter/cha

Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread Abdelkader Boudih
TROLL DETECTED! a) Not using complex attacks could be a sign of smartness and the level of moronism of the admins! Are you jealous ? b) And you are not good at it! Are you jealous ? c) crowd sourcing and community building is one of the most seeking thing currently in this era! If they are

Re: [Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread lulzb0at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ugay its all for lulz On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:33:47 + "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" wrote: >I just wanted to make a couple of consideration about Lulzsec, >without >special reason, just because it's crossing to my mind. > >a) They are NOT carrying on

[Full-disclosure] Lulzsec as irc warrior 2.0?

2011-06-19 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
I just wanted to make a couple of consideration about Lulzsec, without special reason, just because it's crossing to my mind. a) They are NOT carrying on technically complex attack Just web hacking and sql injection over a wide set of vulnerable website. Nothing so complex i would say, no particu