-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FD can't be fully moderated because this will become bugtraq xss and sql
injection land hehe, with vulnerabilities posted with a big delay
between sending and publishing, sometimes it can take up than 3-4 days
to publish a vulnerability on bugtraq
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Towles
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists
:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Towles
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Moderated lists
Why not do
What about a entirely separate Full-Disclosure-Admins list?
Quite apart from the fact that the guy in charge of the list has already
said that this is not going to happen, and that any further discussion on
this point is irrelevant - you're still not actually gaining anything.
I would have
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of keeping
track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user banned, then so
be it...
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
is to have the user banned, then so be it...
If the ultimate goal is to keep the crap factor down, moderation
will only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the
noise ratio.
--A
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines of keeping
track of
On 12/15/05,12/15/05, Andy Lindeman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the ultimate goal is to keep the crap factor down, moderationwill only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the noise ratio.--A
a) moderate one user (turns list into bugtraq)
b) real disclosure is
Todd Towles wrote:
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when
a yahoo starts spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only
members older then xyz date have a vote) If the list's wish
is to have the user banned,
Why not do a self-regulating list? Something along the lines
of keeping
track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user
banned, then so
be
Maybe I'm way off base here, (I'm sure you'll let me know) but if you
don't even bother
opening the full-disclosure folder, How did you find something so
offensive in it??
Kinda like I never watch porn but I'm totally offended by the
#$%@^%$#$@ stuff!
Pretty curious to me.
Well dude(s)
I agree.. also anyone who talks about Moderation needs to remember there is a
reason its call Full-disclosure...
its takes like 3 seconds to hit del on stuff you dont want to read.. Come on
let us have a little bit of fun it will die down in a while..
SNIP
You guy's need some cheese to go with
-
From: Rachael Treu Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Enrico Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Moderated?
If you've been lurking here for years, you should also
be able to remember 2 things...
1. This list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
, fuck i dont even bother opening my full-disclosure folder
half the time now cause i know its full of crap.
And when you do open it, all you do is pick a thread and bitch about
it, that really helps matters.
I happen to love the way that FD
-disclosure] Moderated?
If you've been lurking here for years, you should also
be able to remember 2 things...
1. This list is is based on unmoderated communications.
2. This list is notorious for the colorful belligerence
and of its posters and rampant barking of wild animals.
Where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
i read this list now for a few years and a while ago it was (ok is still
is...) a good information source for vulnerabilities and other security
relevant informations.
But since a while it seems like kids do a good job on taking over
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 19:35:08 +0200, Enrico Kern said:
Maybe its no bad idea to get some dedicated guys to sort this bullshit out
here. Just a suggestion.
bugtraq@securityfocus.com is over there -
pgpRpfzJ5ND86.pgp
Description: PGP signature
If you've been lurking here for years, you should also
be able to remember 2 things...
1. This list is is based on unmoderated communications.
2. This list is notorious for the colorful belligerence
and of its posters and rampant barking of wild animals.
Where have you been? ;)
Searching the
You guy's need some cheese to go with that WHINE!,
Life is short and there's nothing wrong with a good laugh
now and then. Relax and smell the roses along the way.
Glenn
At 10:35 AM 9/8/2005, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
i read this list now for a few
I don't know what I would do without my daily dose of drama, God forbid do NOT make me watch daytime soaps!
On 9/8/05, Andre Ludwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you by chance have a bit of Chabichou du Poitou? Oh its simplymarvelous with a good chardonnay.
DreOn 9/8/05, Glenn Hamblin [EMAIL
20 matches
Mail list logo
