On 3/12/06, SO SECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can provide the evidence to support your claim that the information
published by the blogger was already in the public non-corporate circuit
prior to the blog entry being made, do get in touch.
You got me thinking
Dear All,Do you, uh, Yahoo? Itappears no action will be taken against a Yahoo employee who disclosed confidential corporate side security information (with screenshots) to his weblog. This obviously gives the green light for anyone at Yahoo to do the same in the future. Why have a Yahoo
On 3/12/06, SO SECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears no action will be taken against a Yahoo employee who disclosed
confidential corporate side security information (with screenshots) to his
weblog. This obviously gives the green light for anyone at Yahoo to do the
This isn't confidential Yahoo information. It's not even confidential
ADP information -- any company who uses ADP's probusiness workcenter has
subjected its employees to this ridiculous password complexity
requirement.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:41:18AM -0800, SO SECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
If you can provide the evidence tosupport your claim that the information published by the blogger was already in the public non-corporate circuit prior to the blog entry being made, do get in touch. Whilethe informationmay be common knowledge amoung corporate users of ADP,it doesn't say the
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, SO SECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE wrote:
ADP
were unavailable for comment at time of this message being submitted to
Full-Disclosure mailing list. http://tinyurl.com/plqt3
This URL describes ADPs not unreasonable password policy (8-14 characters,
must contain special chars,
