Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-07 Thread InfoSecBOFH
On 1/6/06, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate to get involved, but AT LEAST HE'S TRYING. Even if his findings aren't going to cause a worldwide virus epidemic if the details are leaked or disclosed irresponsibly, they do contribute to the computer security industry and to the safety of the

RE: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-07 Thread Paul
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of InfoSecBOFH Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:58 AM To: Joe Average Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh Oh here we go again... n3td3v jumps into the circle jerk. Once again proving you know nothing

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-07 Thread fok yo
2006/1/6, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: + fixing them after people like you break them. N3td3v has the interests ofYahoo/Google and their customers in mind as priority one, making his hat pretty white. Who do you think is given more credibility? Lol, interests of google customers my ass. Priority 1

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-06 Thread Exibar
to the list, in the case of this guy no loss... Ex - Original Message - From: InfoSecBOFH [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:58 AM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh Oh here we go again

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread Stan Bubrouski
Oh where to begin... On 1/5/06, Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess he got bored of turning netdev into public enemy number one, to You are n3td3v, and talking in the third person under an assumed identity just adds to your own turmoil. divert attention away from the real guy who is

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread foofus
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:53:01PM +, Joe Average wrote: [snip] It brings up some issues with communication and coordination we've observed during 2005. We can't disclose things like employee names, but i'm sure you get the idea.

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread Joe Average
Why are you mentioning n3td3v? This thread is about infosecbofh, please keep on topic. I don't believe the two XSSing vulnerabilities on Google Groups is all netdev is responsible for. Look closer into whats going on. Theres a world of conspriacy out there to be had. Lets not argue amoung

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread Stan Bubrouski
On 1/5/06, Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you mentioning n3td3v? This thread is about infosecbofh, please keep First of all: Joe Average to Frank, full-disclosure 11:28 am (4 hours ago) I guess he got bored of turning netdev into public enemy number one, to divert attention away

RE: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread srenna
yeah how hard is it to hit delete you kids are whiny Original Message Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh From: Peter Besenbruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, January 05, 2006 12:53 pm To: Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread Joe Average
, but its a waste of time and even the ape wouldget bored. scriptalert(STFU);/script -sk - Original Message - From: Joe Average To: Stan Bubrouski ; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:23 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh Why are you mentioning

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread John Cartwright
Hi I am tired of asking you to take this off-list. Consider yourself moderated. Cheers - John ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2006-01-05 Thread InfoSecBOFH
Oh here we go again... n3td3v jumps into the circle jerk. Once again proving you know nothing of what you are talking about. The load I left on your mom's chin contained more exploit code than you and your dumb ass split personality could ever come up with. Don't you have some 1337 XSS holes to

RE: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-16 Thread Randall M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of poo Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:44 AM To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-16 Thread Stan Bubrouski
I wonder if he's sending himself gmail invites...lol -sb On 12/15/05, sk / GroundZero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so pathetic, n3td0rk already has to invent imaginary people which are on his side. so its not always he against the FD list. oh well boy, you just proove once more how lame you

Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-15 Thread Xyberpix
WTF?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? ROFLMAO1 On Thu Dec 15 10:54 , Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: please leave list unless you stop the abuse against netdev ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter:

Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-15 Thread poo
lol nice try but no donut On 12/15/05, Xyberpix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WTF??[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??ROFLMAO1 On Thu Dec 15 10:54 , Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:please leave list unless you stop the abuse against netdev___

RE: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-15 Thread Todd Towles
Hey X, that must be some of that super intel grabbing SE action..lol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xyberpix Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:58 AM To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk; Joe Average Subject: Re: [Full

Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-15 Thread sk / GroundZero
so pathetic, n3td0rkalready has toinvent imaginary people which are on his side. so its not always he against the FD list. oh well boy, you just proove once more how lame you are. look at his31337 social engineering skills! has so awsome.. but heyjust in case you really really arent n3td3v

Re: [Full-disclosure] InfoSecBOFH and other trouble makers

2005-12-15 Thread InfoSecBOFH
I havent laughed this hard in a long time. Sure n3tkiddie I'll leave you alone. Just leave the list alone with your stupidity first. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and

Re: [Full-disclosure] infosecbofh

2005-12-15 Thread InfoSecBOFH
ahahaha... sure troll. On 12/15/05, Joe Average [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: your remarks on the list have been less than helpful, i have spoke with netdev to resolve the issue and hopefully with your help the list can get back to normal dont add to the noise we're all professionals