That paragraph says pretty much the exact opposite of what you understood.
Also, could we please stop refuting points nobody even made in the first
place? OP never claimed this to be a vulnerability, nor ever said
robots.txt is a proper security mechanism to hide files in public web
directories.
Yes I think you misunderstood or more likely I poorly worded the post. White
listing is better than black listing. Black listing something you don't want
googlebot to index just makes it easier for someone to find something you don't
want indexed. If that content is sensitive, it probably
Opera has done this for quite some time now. They translate and compresses
the website into their own language called OBML:
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-binary-markup-language/
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Philip Whitehouse phi...@whiuk.com wrote:
On 7 Dec 2012, at 19:03,
I. DESCRIPTION
---
portable-phpMyAdmin doesn't verify an existing WordPress session
(privileged or not) when accessing the plugin file path directly. Because
of how this plugin works, a default installation will provide a full
phpMyAdmin console with the
Let us remind you that PHDays CTF Quals starts on the 15th of December and will
last for three days. 300 teamshttp://quals.phdays.com/teams/leaders from more
than 30 different countries of the world have already registered. You still can
join!
The teams will try their hands at security
Hello,
we just released a new paper, which discusses ideas of advanced runtime
encryption of .NET executables.
You can find the paper here: http://www.nullsecurity.net/papers.html
Enjoy reading it.
Cheers,
noptrix
--
Name: Levon 'noptrix' Kayan
E-Mail: nopt...@nullsecurity.net
GPG key:
I restate my email's second point.
Google is indexing robots.txt because (from all the examples I can see)
robots.txt doesn't contain a line to disallow indexing of robots.txt
It is possible that some web sites provide actual content in a file that
happens to be called robots.txt (e.g a
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Philip Whitehouse phi...@whiuk.com wrote:
I restate my email's second point.
Google is indexing robots.txt because (from all the examples I can see)
robots.txt doesn't contain a line to disallow indexing of robots.txt
It is possible that some web sites
