Danny wrote:
The Secret Service, or any other government enforcement agency would
not condone, promote, or participate in website defacement
activities.
I know some of you have little faith in these agencies, but,
one thing
is for sure, they would never stoop this low.
Insecure replied:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/16/2004
01:22:25 PM:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and
other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or replacement page
showing words from the intelligence
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:23:52 -0600, Curt Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danny wrote:
The Secret Service, or any other government enforcement agency would
not condone, promote, or participate in website defacement
activities.
I know some of you have little faith in these agencies, but,
.
From: Curt Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Insecure' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Danny' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] controversial shadowcrew site hacked by
secret service?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:23:52 -0600
Danny wrote:
The Secret Service, or any other
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:21:01 -0800, josh abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this stuff is totally real to the max. my cousin's former roomate's
neighbor's uncle jessie once worked for the secret service and he told me
it's completely standard protocol to have the mission impossible theme in
the
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:36:58 - (UTC), Nick I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/29/operation_firewall/print.html
http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,97017,00.html
http://news.com.com/2102-7348_3-5431419.html?tag=st.util.print
Thanks, n3td3v
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or replacement page
showing words from the intelligence services.
http://www.shadowcrew.com
Is this fake or
] controversial shadowcrew site hacked by
secret service?
http://marketwatch-cnet.com.com/Secret+Service+busts+online+ID+fraud+rin
g/2100-7348_3-5431419.html?tag=nl
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and other
What do you think?
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/October/04_crm_726.htm
We all knew they were doing fake IDs and the such..it was only time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:59 AM
To:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9866
I have seen nothing stating that this is a spoof.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:58:46PM +, n3td3v wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or replacement page
showing words
http://marketwatch-cnet.com.com/Secret+Service+busts+online+ID+fraud+ring/2100-7348_3-5431419.html?tag=nl
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or
And everybody who goes there will have their ip address logged (unless
you use someone elses' proxy server)
So, if the secret service 0wn!z this box, they also 0wn! the logs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Tuesday,
n3td3v wrote:
http://www.shadowcrew.com
Is this fake or real? Who knows..
http://news.com.com/2100-7348_3-5431419.html
Quite real. It occurred at the end of October.
Cheers,
Anders.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:50:45 -0500, Esler, Joel - Contractor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe the SS would modify someone else's website. Hard to
believe.
Indeed, I was baffled on visiting the site. I wasn't aware it was
normal SS policy to replace/deface whatever you want to call it,
Danny wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:46 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site which was hosting services, like bombs, fake ID and other
terrorist stuff is now showing a defacement or replacement page
showing words from the intelligence services.
http://www.shadowcrew.com
Is this
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:50:45 -0500, Esler, Joel - Contractor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe the SS would modify someone else's website. Hard to
believe.
Isonews.com anyone? :P
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
This is real. The secret service busted several people including the
admin of shadowcrew in Operation Firewall and replaced the home page
with one that they thought was humorous. It wasnt a hack per se, but
needless to say shadowcrew is out of commission, and the secret service is
is possession
OT (slightly), but a statement in the News.com[1] story is incorrect.
It states that In August, the U.S. Department of Justice made arrests
in five states on charges of criminal copyright infringement in an
action dubbed Operation Digital Gridlock... (middle of 4th
paragraph).
No arrests were
18 matches
Mail list logo