Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
Just went to the site again and it seems to be OK now. The site that comes up seems to be a site about computer security which is what I am assuming the original sender expected. Regards, Nancy Kramer Webmaster http://www.americandreamcars.com Free Color Picture Ads for Collector Cars One of the Ten Best Places To Buy or Sell a Collector Car on the Web At 01:17 PM 1/18/2004, Dani Wuck wrote: KF wrote: cached copy? -KF No sir: /me wrote: I don't know the site, And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? - wuck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
Just checked it out and I get a page that says "This site is planned for development". I guess they lost their domain. Shows one ought to have auto renew. Regards, Nancy Kramer Webmaster http://www.americandreamcars.com Free Color Picture Ads for Collector Cars One of the Ten Best Places To Buy or Sell a Collector Car on the Web At 01:51 PM 1/18/2004, Chris Rose wrote: > KF wrote: > > > cached copy? > > -KF > > No sir: > > And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle > auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? Mozilla may not - but your ISP may. I get the oingo list of directories. Kind Regards, Chris Rose () ASCII ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
> KF wrote: > > > cached copy? > > -KF > > No sir: > > And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle > auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? Mozilla may not - but your ISP may. I get the oingo list of directories. Kind Regards, Chris Rose () ASCII ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
com A (Address) 212.118.244.163 Dig [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Non-authoritative answer Query for www.net-security.org type=255 class=1 www.net-security.org A (Address) 66.151.151.171 net-security.org NS (Nameserver) dns4.name-services.com net-security.org NS (Nameserver) dns5.name-services.com net-security.org NS (Nameserver) dns1.name-services.com net-security.org NS (Nameserver) dns2.name-services.com net-security.org NS (Nameserver) dns3.name-services.com = -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dani Wuck Sent: January 18, 2004 1:17 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ? KF wrote: > cached copy? > -KF No sir: /me wrote: >> I don't know the site, And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? - wuck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
I'm getting a "parked domain" page as well... [Sun 01/18/2004 14:22:41.88] F:\DEV\cpp\OldCmp>ping www.net-security.org Pinging www.net-security.org [66.151.151.171] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.151.151.171: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.151.151.171: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.151.151.171: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.151.151.171: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 66.151.151.171: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 59ms [Sun 01/18/2004 14:22:55.85] F:\DEV\cpp\OldCmp> Home Page for www.net-security.org - Coming soon. http://apps5.oingo.com/apps/domainpark/domainpark.cgi?s=net-security&dp _lp=22&cid=enom9878&dp_p4pid=oingo_inclusion_xml_02&dp_format=1.3&fh=0&dp_pu =2&dp_adult=n" /> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KF Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 7:22 AM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ? cached copy? -KF Dani Wuck wrote: > Daigoku wrote: > >> Are you able to go on the Help Net Security WebSite ? >> (http://www.net-security.org) When i try to connect to HNS website >> i'm redirected to a oingo website and you ? >> >> The expiration date of the whois is 2004-01-18, i think they have >> been victim of a dot squatting... ? What do you think about that ? > > > I don't know the site, but everything seems normal? > > This is a snippet of what I've found on the portal: > > Review - Implementing SSH > With a bunch of security features, SSH is being adopted by a great > number of system administrators that are trying to implement some way > of secure tunneling to their networks. Although the title of the book > implies a very technical publication, the book should suite a variety > of readers interested in how to use and optimize the secure shell. > [more] Friday, 16 January 2004, 11:59 AM CET > > > The corporate identity crisis > Secure messaging has traditionally posed a problem in a corporate > environment for two main reasons: firstly, the complexity of > maintaining the infrastructure of "keys," which serve similar roles to > unique identification credentials, and secondly, the complexity of > explaining and using the solutions. [more] Thursday, 15 January 2004, > 3:33 PM CET > > > Review - Beginning Red Hat Linux 9 > The many authors managed to squeeze into this title the most important > facts for a novice user and point him into the right direction. Read > on to discover what's inside this book. [more] Tuesday, 13 January > 2004, 5:24 PM CET > > > FreeBSD 5.2 is here > This release contains a number of significant stability and > performance improvements over FreeBSD 5.1. Read on to find out what > security issues have been fixed in this version. [more] Tuesday, 13 > January 2004, 1:13 AM CET > > - wuck > > ___ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
Dani Wuck wrote: KF wrote: cached copy? -KF No sir: /me wrote: I don't know the site, And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? - wuck Well when I first read your e-mail I was still getting the oingo site but the original net-security.org site appears to be back now - for me at least Luke ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
KF wrote: cached copy? -KF No sir: /me wrote: I don't know the site, And if I'd been there I'd known it. And I don't think Mozilla happens to have an idle auto-caching function for http://www.net-security.org out of the box? - wuck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
cached copy? -KF Dani Wuck wrote: Daigoku wrote: Are you able to go on the Help Net Security WebSite ? (http://www.net-security.org) When i try to connect to HNS website i'm redirected to a oingo website and you ? The expiration date of the whois is 2004-01-18, i think they have been victim of a dot squatting... ? What do you think about that ? I don't know the site, but everything seems normal? This is a snippet of what I've found on the portal: Review - Implementing SSH With a bunch of security features, SSH is being adopted by a great number of system administrators that are trying to implement some way of secure tunneling to their networks. Although the title of the book implies a very technical publication, the book should suite a variety of readers interested in how to use and optimize the secure shell. [more] Friday, 16 January 2004, 11:59 AM CET The corporate identity crisis Secure messaging has traditionally posed a problem in a corporate environment for two main reasons: firstly, the complexity of maintaining the infrastructure of "keys," which serve similar roles to unique identification credentials, and secondly, the complexity of explaining and using the solutions. [more] Thursday, 15 January 2004, 3:33 PM CET Review - Beginning Red Hat Linux 9 The many authors managed to squeeze into this title the most important facts for a novice user and point him into the right direction. Read on to discover what's inside this book. [more] Tuesday, 13 January 2004, 5:24 PM CET FreeBSD 5.2 is here This release contains a number of significant stability and performance improvements over FreeBSD 5.1. Read on to find out what security issues have been fixed in this version. [more] Tuesday, 13 January 2004, 1:13 AM CET - wuck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
fsckin html bastards the site is up. the meas ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
Daigoku wrote: Are you able to go on the Help Net Security WebSite ? (http://www.net-security.org) When i try to connect to HNS website i'm redirected to a oingo website and you ? The expiration date of the whois is 2004-01-18, i think they have been victim of a dot squatting... ? What do you think about that ? I don't know the site, but everything seems normal? This is a snippet of what I've found on the portal: Review - Implementing SSH With a bunch of security features, SSH is being adopted by a great number of system administrators that are trying to implement some way of secure tunneling to their networks. Although the title of the book implies a very technical publication, the book should suite a variety of readers interested in how to use and optimize the secure shell. [more] Friday, 16 January 2004, 11:59 AM CET The corporate identity crisis Secure messaging has traditionally posed a problem in a corporate environment for two main reasons: firstly, the complexity of maintaining the infrastructure of "keys," which serve similar roles to unique identification credentials, and secondly, the complexity of explaining and using the solutions. [more] Thursday, 15 January 2004, 3:33 PM CET Review - Beginning Red Hat Linux 9 The many authors managed to squeeze into this title the most important facts for a novice user and point him into the right direction. Read on to discover what's inside this book. [more] Tuesday, 13 January 2004, 5:24 PM CET FreeBSD 5.2 is here This release contains a number of significant stability and performance improvements over FreeBSD 5.1. Read on to find out what security issues have been fixed in this version. [more] Tuesday, 13 January 2004, 1:13 AM CET - wuck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ?
same here John, now that is unfortunate, all those reminders from there ISP host must of not been in bold ;) Regards - Original Message - From: Daigoku To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Help Net Security Dot Squatting ? Are you able to go on the Help Net Security WebSite ? (http://www.net-security.org) When i try to connect to HNS website i'm redirected to a oingo website and you ? The expiration date of the whois is 2004-01-18, i think they have been victim of a dot squatting... ? What do you think about that ? Regards, John Avalon Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
