I have simply been lurking for some time, but the first part of this post
from Thomas Lunde (combined with a post from someone else the other day about
our attachment to outdated concepts) galvanised me into action (again) - on a
theme I have addressed a number of times over the past two
so how does the "national income" relate to GDP?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
puzzled over them earlier.
Bill asks about the components of GDP and perhaps this will help.
In 1995, for example:
. GDP in the U.S. totaled $7,245.8 billion
.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 00:13:23 -0500
From: Antonio Lambe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [csdgen] Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity.
Dear Administrator,
The appended material is probably inappropriate
for the full CSDGen
-- Forwarded Message --
From: Annelise J.Hansen, 106457,2734
TO: Deling Wang, INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATE: 08-12-97 00.15
RE: Copy of: [passem] Really Final Kyoto Action Alert!
Final Kyoto Action alert
Thanks for your great
Jay wrote:
#1. That the approaching dieoff is the WORST possible outcome, and
that the primary goal of governments MUST be to avoid that dieoff.
#2. That participants are willing to put everything on the table -- are
willing to abandon any "belief" in the face of contrary scientific
Your program is what, socialism?
and why not? Convincing capitalist to be capitalist in
a non-capitalist way is more difficult than socialism.
Eva
At 12:23 PM 12/9/97 +, you wrote:
What you suggest is an interesting excercise
in democracy.
However I hate to
Dear Mary,
Thank you for acknowledging my post, but for some reason, I feel their is
more to your response than you are telling us. Join in, it is only when
the disadvantaged speak their truth that others learn.
Respectfully,
Thomas Lunde
Dear Mr. Spencer,
What a great post and I feel your insights tie together a few small threads
we keep chewing on in this list. Jay Hanson, in his focus on energy is
describing another "successful" one dimensional system, the burning of
fossil fuels which the results are now being debated in
Thanks to Jim Fleming, we now have the E-mail addresses of 77 U.S.
senators (below).
Charles Mueller, Editor
ANTITRUST LAW ECONOMICS REVIEW
http://webpages.metrolink.net/~cmueller
@
U.S. Senate e-mail addresses
Alabama - Shelby, Richard C. (R) - [EMAIL
Barry,
When you look at the whole paragraph where the "invisible hand" is mentioned
by Smith, it says exactly the opposite of what's being taught and propagandized.
It is the REAL meaning of the invisible hand that's causing the dieoff.
As for being goosed by it, reminds me of the time 20
I realize that I am violating all the copywright caveats that we have
agred to observe. But the following article from the Los Angeles Times
is so interesting, I felt compelled to post it.
My apologies to Cordell and Lerner.
Hugh McGuire
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/OPINION/topstory.html
More progress. Franklin (below) reports that he has the software
needed for a 1-button post to all of our 77 senators with E-mail addresses
"pretty much ready to go." Paul Petricone gives us some new links on
mailing to Congress (below). And Dan Mogin (also below) has identified for
Let me offer a 2d modest proposal. The first was a question: Does
computer technology now permit the combining of the E-mail addresses of our
100 U.S. senators (and our 435 congressmen, and our 1,000 federal judges)
into a 'mailing list' format such that any U.S. citizen (or anyone
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 12:34:30 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Hendrik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: October draft of the MAI on line
The October draft text of the MAI (Multilateral Agreement on Investment)
can be downloaded from the following URL:
Ed Weick quite reasonably asked:
Am I alone in wondering where we are going?
I, for one, don't think the answer is "off into blue sky" or "around in
circles". Only a few of us are employed directly in labour, work or
economic policy making or research. The official FW title (as of last
Ed Weick wondered (in part):
Am I alone in wondering where we are going?
And Michael Spencer replied (in part),
I, for one, don't think the answer is "off into blue sky" or "around in
circles". . .
And . . . to judge the listserv by the conversation on the list is missing a
large part of
16 matches
Mail list logo
