Dear Ed:
Thanks for reading my proposal and commenting.
Ed said:
If the objective is to transfer income from the haves to the have nots, I
don't understand why it can't be done through the tax system. Any parent
without an income could be given a basic credit, hence a "refund", of
$15,000,
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I keep seeing on The History Channel that
cretin Reagan looking at the Berlin Wall, and
declaming: "Tear Down That Wall!", and I keep thinking
maybe things would be better today if that wall
had taken a few more years to be dismantled in a
more
Dear Ed;
Just a small continuation of my last post in which I argued that:
In summing up this lengthy rebuttal, I have had to do some soul searching
about my concepts. Basically, I believe people come before profit and that
people are more important than profit. We could still have Capital,
I am posting this letter which was put out on an attachment on another list
to show you the difference between rhetoric and reality. The Common Sense
Revolution of our neo con Premier who got elected on the concept of giving a
tax break to Ontarians by managing the budget from the point of view
Between February and April of this year David Croteau of Virginia
Commonwealth University conducted a survey of Washington, D.C. based
journalists. His report on that survey is on the Fairness and Accuracy in
Reporting (FAIR) website:
http://www.fair.org/reports/journalist-survey.html
The
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I keep seeing on The History Channel that
cretin Reagan looking at the Berlin Wall, and
declaming: "Tear Down That Wall!", and I keep thinking
maybe things would be better today if that wall
had taken a few more years to be dismantled in a
more
Tom Walker wrote:
[snip]
Underlying this almost
instantaneous decay of the system has been the slow erosion of morally
defensible (traditionalist) structures of individual motivations. As
Habermas argued, "Bourgeois culture as a whole was never able to reproduce
itself from itself. It was
Collapse in the mathematical sense can be clearly defined by the
changing conditions in a set of equations.
collapse in other areas lacks the clarity. And, in fact, seems to miss
the one key ingrediaent "time". The dinasauers were wiped out in a
catastrophe. What looks like a complete change
Dear Thomas,
Your digitalized debate with Ed Weick is classic. It's not only
informative (where did you two *get* all that information!?), it's
fun and concise and lively and thought-provoking and everything a
good debate should be. The Lunde-Weick Exchange is right up there
with Benny
Thomas Lunde wrote the following quote from Mr. Krugman, economist
at MIT:
"subordinating the needs of finance to those of people"
What a unique idea! It's a refreshing change after the '80's mantra
"Greed Is Good, Greed Is God" popularized by Oliver's Gecko and the
oil companies'
Durant wrote:
The following article is a masterful
response to pie-thinking (zero-sum mentality):
Szczepanski, J. (1981). Individuality and society.
Impact of science on society, 31(4), 461-466.
any chance of a sum-up or abstract?
[snip]
I'll just try to quote from loving
Thomas Lunde wrote the following quote from Mr. Krugman, economist
at MIT:
"subordinating the needs of finance to those of people"
What a unique idea! It's a refreshing change after the '80's mantra
"Greed Is Good, Greed Is God" popularized by Oliver's Gecko and the
oil companies'
12 matches
Mail list logo
