Re: Re:democracy

1999-02-03 Thread Thomas Lunde
Thomas: This is a good little essay and touch's on some very important observations. Victor wrote: As I recall, this thread got started with a comment about many of the voters seeming to be neither intelligent nor well-informed.I'm sure from many of his postings that Ed Weick did not mean this

Re: Re:democracy

1999-02-01 Thread Ross James Swanston
At 04:45 PM 1/30/99 -0500, you wrote: Victor Milne: As I recall, this thread got started with a comment about many of the voters seeming to be neither intelligent nor well-informed. I'm sure from many of his postings that Ed Weick did not mean this in an elitist sense. No, I didn't mean it in

Re:democracy

1999-01-30 Thread Victor Milne
As I recall, this thread got started with a comment about many of the voters seeming to be neither intelligent nor well-informed. I'm sure from many of his postings that Ed Weick did not mean this in an elitist sense. I don't think lack of intelligence is really the problem. I also do not think

Re: Re:democracy

1999-01-30 Thread Edward Weick
Victor Milne: As I recall, this thread got started with a comment about many of the voters seeming to be neither intelligent nor well-informed. I'm sure from many of his postings that Ed Weick did not mean this in an elitist sense. No, I didn't mean it in an elitist sense. I meant it very

Re: re:democracy

1999-01-29 Thread Eva Durant
I pointed out (often), that there are fundamental conditions for a proper working democracy, and these conditions did not exist in our history so far. Then the reasonable observer would conclude they never will. What about universal literacy? What about the technology to make information

re:democracy

1999-01-28 Thread Eva Durant
Jay: ... As it has turned out, modern evolutionary scientists have found that the Founding Fathers were right: true democracy won?t work. Natural selection and genetic development created a human tendency for dominance, submission, hierarchy, and obedience, as opposed to equality and democracy.

re:democracy

1999-01-28 Thread Eva Durant
Ed W.: ... Somehow I'm not at all surprised that this is your point of view. But then how is merit to be determined? Testing and experience, you say, but who will assess this? Surely an intelligent and informed public should have something to do with it. But, I suppose you would then argue

Re: re:democracy

1999-01-28 Thread Jay Hanson
- Original Message - From: Eva Durant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Natural selection and genetic development works in a much larger time scale than social depelopment that may change human hierarchical, obedient etc behaviour in less than a generation and such socially conditioned behaviour forms