FYI,

Steve

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:41:06 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: Carole Renouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

A quick summary of our lay panel's report for those who may be interested,
but I am sure you will find more detail in due course on the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Website at
<http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/consconf/splash.htm>

Major recommendations include:

1. Regulation which better serves community interests, namely a statutory
authority for gene technology with well-balanced representation, and
commercially significant sanctions. Its deliberations should also be public. 

2. The regulation of gene technology should not be moved from the Department
of Health to the Department of Agriculture.

3. All genetically modified foods should be labelled to allow free and
informed consumer choice. We reject the use of the term 'substantial
equivalence' because of its narrow scientific application.

4. No new commercial releases or unlabelled importation of genetically
modified foods, both whole or processed, until the GTO is in place, a clear
Australian position on the Biosafety Protocol has been established, and an
all-encompassing labelling system has been introduced.

5. Decisions by any regulatory body should take into account more than just
science. The overriding principle when drafting legislation should be the
environment and the physical, mental and social health of individuals.

6. Australia should support a regulated and precautionary approach to trade
in relation to GMOs in the Biosafety Protocol, the provision of a specific
liability regime, and segregation and labelling of all products. 

7. Environment and Health Departments should develop strategies to prepare
for any health or environmental problems from GMOs, for example, an adverse
reactions register.

8. Independent assessment of the viability and impacts of choosing non-GMO
options should be carried out, and this information communicated to the public.

9. Ethicists should be included in all GMO policy-making.

10. There should be an inquiry by the ACCC (Consumer and Competition
Commission) into multinational monopolies in the food industry.

11. Public awareness programs must include varying perspectives, like the
Consensus Conference has.

12. Government should embrace a commitment to bring together all
stakeholders to reach agreement on mutually beneficial solutions, rather
than the way different interests now compete to lobby government.


-- 

"To teach how to live without certainty, and yet without being 
paralyzed by hesitation, is perhaps the chief thing that philosophy, 
in our age, can still do for those who study it."
Bertrand Russell,  "A History of Western Philosophy"

Reply via email to