Jay Hanson wrote:
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A given quantity of stuff is not a constant. That's the
point I was trying to make. Technological advance
(advance in knowledge in general...)
There is no creation of matter/energy Brad. Technology can not repeal the
Jay Hanson wrote:
Is there not confusion within the ranks of our allegedly erudite
economic scholars who see only increased production as solution to
Social Problems?
Obviously, if one can not "grow", then one must "redistribute". That is
why
it will be opposed to the very bloody end.
]
914.238.0788 / 27 Poillon Rd, Chappaqua, NY 10514-3403 USA
---
![%THINK;[SGML]] Visit my website == http://www.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 5:50
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sustainablity Plan B (and -- perhaps -- meta-plan C)
Jay Hanson wrote:
Is there not confusion within the ranks
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A given quantity of stuff is not a constant. That's the
point I was trying to make. Technological advance
(advance in knowledge in general...)
There is no creation of matter/energy Brad. Technology can not repeal the
laws of thermodynamics. As a
Jay Hanson wrote,
Robert L. Hickerson wrote an interesting piece about M. King Hubbert.
Thanks to Jay for bringing up Robert Hickerson's essay on King Hubbert. In
connection with my own cause celebre, the reduction of work time, I would be
remiss if I failed to point out Hickerson's penultimate
Is there not confusion within the ranks of our allegedly erudite
economic scholars who see only increased production as solution to
Social Problems?
Obviously, if one can not "grow", then one must "redistribute". That is why
it will be opposed to the very bloody end.
The problem of human
