>In today's news:
>
>EI and welfare need radical revamp, group says
>
>Norma Greenaway, CanWest News Service; Ottawa Citizen
>Published: Monday, July 03, 2006
>
>OTTAWA -- The cornerstones of Canada's system for providing income 
>protection Employment Insurance and welfare have failed and should 
>be replaced by a more effective and comprehensive plan, says a 
>report advocating a new package of adult benefits.
>The authors admit the proposed package, described as a "radical" 
>revamping of the current system, would cost more than the $24 
>billion spent annually on EI and welfare. However, they say it would 
>be a more labour-market-oriented option for Canadians who are 
>temporarily out of work, and also a more effective safety net for 
>disabled Canadians who might be unable to work.
>"It's a total revamp of our entire security system aimed at adults 
>of working age," Michael Mendelson, one of the authors, said in an 
>interview. "There has been a lack of a comprehensive vision of what 
>income security needs to be in a modern globalized economy."
>The report, published by the Caledon Institute of Social Policy, 
>proposes the broad outlines of a three-tier income-security system 
>that, it acknowledges, is a work in progress and still missing a 
>price tag.
>"It might require more money to implement the architecture we are 
>talking about," Mendelson said. "But we think there would be more 
>payback per dollar spent."
>Tier one would replace EI, which is limited to people who have 
>contributed to the plan and who have a significant connection to the 
>workforce, with a temporary income program. Unlike EI, the new 
>program would be a non-contributory benefit funded out of general 
>federal revenues.
>The idea is to provide income security to people who are temporarily 
>unemployed and actively seeking work, but who are now excluded for 
>one reason or another from collecting EI, and who may have no 
>recourse other than to go on welfare.
>Tier two, dubbed employment preparation, would be financed by the 
>provinces and is aimed at people who lack enough skills to find a 
>job and maintain it. Flat-rate payments would replace the current 
>welfare system, and focus on longer-term training if necessary. The 
>employment-preparation payments might continue for several years for 
>some recipients, but they would not be expected to provide permanent 
>income support.
>The third tier is billed as basic income, an income-tested safety 
>net for people who cannot reasonably be expected to earn an adequate 
>income from employment because of severe and prolonged disability. 
>There would be no time limits on the benefit, financed out of 
>federal revenues.
>The report says the cornerstone of the new system is a well-funded 
>National Child Benefit. Under the plan, the current federal payment 
>of almost $3,000 per child a year would have to increase to $5,000 a 
>year.
>Mendelson said ensuring that children are covered frees the system 
>to provide a highly simplified benefit schedule that is oriented 
>towards an adult benefit similarly to a wage.
>"You don't get a wage adjusted to the number of children you have," 
>he noted. "Treating people like adults, we think, is one of the 
>fundamental cornerstones of the reform."
>
>Mendelson says the draft plan should appeal to federal and 
>provincial governments across the political spectrum.
>"For the left, it's providing better income security," he said. "And 
>for the right, it's saying people need to get jobs and we need to 
>enable them to get jobs."
>He suggested concerns about labour shortages, especially as the baby 
>boomers age and retire, should spur governments to seriously 
>consider ditching the current system of EI and welfare.
>Mendelson also said the plan, which would require the federal 
>government to fund two of the tiers, would partially address the 
>"fiscal imbalance" between the revenue-raising powers of the federal 
>and provincial governments.
>
>Ottawa Citizen
>
>http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=306b0ecb-df3a-491b-99d7-e1231fc3bd71&k=10214&p=2

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to