The New Economics of Hunger 
          By Anthony Faiola 
          The Washington Post 

          Sunday 27 April 2008 

        A brutal convergence of events has hit an unprepared global market, and 
grain prices are sky high. The world's poor suffer most.
          The globe's worst food crisis in a generation emerged as a blip on 
the big boards and computer screens of America's great grain exchanges. At 
first, it seemed like little more than a bout of bad weather. 

          In Chicago, Minneapolis and Kansas City, traders watched from the 
pits early last summer as wheat prices spiked amid mediocre harvests in the 
United States and Europe and signs of prolonged drought in Australia. But 
within a few weeks, the traders discerned an ominous snowball effect - one that 
would eventually bring down a prime minister in Haiti, make more children in 
Mauritania go to bed hungry, even cause American executives at Sam's Club to 
restrict sales of large bags of rice. 

          As prices rose, major grain producers including Argentina and 
Ukraine, battling inflation caused in part by soaring oil bills, were moving to 
bar exports on a range of crops to control costs at home. It meant less supply 
on world markets even as global demand entered a fundamentally new phase. 
Already, corn prices had been climbing for months on the back of booming 
government-subsidized ethanol programs. Soybeans were facing pressure from 
surging demand in China. But as supplies in the pipelines of global trade 
shrank, prices for corn, soybeans, wheat, oats, rice and other grains began 
shooting through the roof. 

          At the same time, food was becoming the new gold. Investors fleeing 
Wall Street's mortgage-related strife plowed hundreds of millions of dollars 
into grain futures, driving prices up even more. By Christmas, a global panic 
was building. With fewer places to turn, and tempted by the weaker dollar, 
nations staged a run on the American wheat harvest. 

          Foreign buyers, who typically seek to purchase one or two months' 
supply of wheat at a time, suddenly began to stockpile. They put in orders on 
U.S. grain exchanges two to three times larger than normal as food riots began 
to erupt worldwide. This led major domestic U.S. mills to jump into the fray 
with their own massive orders, fearing that there would soon be no wheat left 
at any price. 

          "Japan, the Philippines, [South] Korea, Taiwan - they all came in 
with huge orders, and no matter how high prices go, they keep on buying," said 
Jeff Voge, chairman of the Kansas City Board of Trade and also an independent 
trader. Grains have surged so high, he said, that some traders are walking off 
the floor for weeks at a time, unable to handle the stress. 

          "We have never seen anything like this before," Voge said. "Prices 
are going up more in one day than they have during entire years in the past. 
But no matter the price, there always seems to be a buyer... . This isn't just 
any commodity. It is food, and people need to eat." 

          Beyond Hunger 

          The food price shock now roiling world markets is destabilizing 
governments, igniting street riots and threatening to send a new wave of hunger 
rippling through the world's poorest nations. It is outpacing even the Soviet 
grain emergency of 1972-75, when world food prices rose 78 percent. By 
comparison, from the beginning of 2005 to early 2008, prices leapt 80 percent, 
according to the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization. Much of the 
increase is being absorbed by middle men - distributors, processors, even 
governments - but consumers worldwide are still feeling the pinch. 

          The convergence of events has thrown world food supply and demand out 
of whack and snowballed into civil turmoil. After hungry mobs and violent riots 
beset Port-au-Prince, Haitian Prime Minister Jacques-Édouard Alexis was forced 
to step down this month. At least 14 countries have been racked by food-related 
violence. In Malaysia, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is struggling for 
political survival after a March rebuke from voters furious over food prices. 
In Bangladesh, more than 20,000 factory workers protesting food prices rampaged 
through the streets two weeks ago, injuring at least 50 people. 

          To quell unrest, countries including Indonesia are digging deep to 
boost food subsidies. The U.N. World Food Program has warned of an alarming 
surge in hunger in areas as far-flung as North Korea and West Africa. The 
crisis, it fears, will plunge more than 100 million of the world's poorest 
people deeper into poverty, forced to spend more and more of their income on 
skyrocketing food bills. 

          "This crisis could result in a cascade of others ... and become a 
multidimensional problem affecting economic growth, social progress and even 
political security around the world," U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said. 

          The New Normal 

          Prices for some crops - such as wheat - have already begun to descend 
off their highs. As farmers rush to plant more wheat now that profit prospects 
have climbed, analysts predict that prices may come down as much as 30 percent 
in the coming months. But that would still leave a year-over-year price hike of 
45 percent. Few believe prices will go back to where they were in early 2006, 
suggesting that the world must cope with a new reality of more expensive food. 

          People worldwide are coping in different ways. For the 1 billion 
living on less than a dollar a day, it is a matter of survival. In a mud hut on 
the Sahara's edge, Manthita Sou, a 43-year-old widow in the Mauritanian desert 
village of Maghleg, is confronting wheat prices that are up 67 percent on local 
markets in the past year. Her solution: stop eating bread. Instead, she has 
downgraded to cheaper foods, such as sorghum, a dark grain widely consumed by 
the world's poorest people. But sorghum has jumped 20 percent in the past 12 
months. Living on the 50 cents a day she earns weaving textiles to support a 
family of three, her answer has been to cut out breakfast, drink tea for lunch 
and ration a small serving of soupy sorghum meal for family dinners. "I don't 
know how long we can survive like this," she said. 

          Countries that have driven food demand in recent years are now 
grappling with the cost of their own success - rising prices. Although China 
has tried to calm its people by announcing reserve grain holdings of 30 to 40 
percent of annual production, a number that had been a state secret, anxiety is 
still running high. In the southern province of Guangdong, there are reports of 
grain hoarding; and in Hong Kong, consumers have stripped store shelves of bags 
of rice. 

          Liu Yinhua, a retired factory worker who lives in the port city of 
Ningbo on China's east coast, said her family of three still eats the same 
things, including pork ribs, fish and vegetables. But they are eating less of 
it. 

          "Almost everything is more expensive now, even normal green 
vegetables," said Liu, 53. "The level of our quality of life is definitely 
reduced." 

          In India, the government recently scrapped all import duties on 
cooking oils and banned exports of non-basmati rice. As in many parts of the 
developing world, the impact in India is being felt the most among the urban 
poor who have fled rural life to live in teeming slums. At a dusty and nearly 
empty market in one New Delhi neighborhood this week, shopkeeper Manjeet Singh, 
52, said people at the market have started hoarding because of fear that rice 
and oil will run out. 

          "If one doesn't have enough to fill one's own stomach, then what's 
the use of an economic boom in exports?" he said, looking sluggish in the 
scorching afternoon sun. He said his customers were asking for cheaper goods, 
like groundnut oil instead of soybean oil. 

          Even wealthy nations are being forced to adjust to a new normal. In 
Japan, a country with a distinct cultural aversion to cheaper, genetically 
modified grains, manufacturers are risking public backlash by importing them 
for use in processed foods for the first time. Inflation in the 15-country zone 
that uses the euro - which includes France, Germany, Spain and Italy - hit 3.6 
percent in March, the highest rate since the currency was adopted almost a 
decade ago and well above the European Central Bank's target of 2.0 percent. 
Food and oil prices were mostly to blame. 

          In the United States, experts say consumers are scaling down on 
quality and scaling up on quantity if it means a better unit price. In the meat 
aisles of major grocery stores, said Phil Lempert, a supermarket analyst, 
steaks are giving way to chopped beef and people used to buying fresh 
blueberries are moving to frozen. Some are even trying to grow their own 
vegetables. 

          "A bigger pinch than ever before," said Pat Carroll, a retiree in 
Congress Heights. "I don't ever remember paying $3 for a loaf of bread." 

          Ill-Equipped Markets 

          The root cause of price surges varies from crop to crop. But the 
crisis is being driven in part by an unprecedented linkage of the food chain. 

          A big reason for higher wheat prices, for instance, is the multiyear 
drought in Australia, something that scientists say may become persistent 
because of global warming. But wheat prices are also rising because U.S. 
farmers have been planting less of it, or moving wheat to less fertile ground. 
That is partly because they are planting more corn to capitalize on the biofuel 
frenzy. 

          This year, at least a fifth and perhaps a quarter of the U.S. corn 
crop will be fed to ethanol plants. As food and fuel fuse, it has presented a 
boon to American farmers after years of stable prices. But it has also helped 
spark the broader food-price shock. 

          "If you didn't have ethanol, you would not have the prices we have 
today," said Bruce Babcock, a professor of economics and the director of the 
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State University. "It 
doesn't mean it's the sole driver. Prices would be higher than we saw earlier 
in this decade because world grain supplies are tighter now than earlier in the 
decade. But we've introduced a new demand into the market." 

          In fact, many economists now say food prices should have climbed much 
higher much earlier. 

          After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the world seemed to shrink with 
rapidly opening markets, surging trade and improved communication and 
transportation technology. Given new market efficiencies and the wide 
availability of relatively cheap food, the once-common practice of hoarding 
grains to protect against the kind of shortfall the world is seeing now seemed 
more and more archaic. Global grain reserves plunged. 

          Yet there was one big problem. The global food trade never became the 
kind of well-honed machine that has made the price of manufactured goods such 
as personal computers and flat-screen TVs increasingly similar worldwide. With 
food, significant subsidies and other barriers meant to protect farmers - 
particularly in Europe, the United States and Japan - have distorted the real 
price of food globally, economists say, preventing the market from normal price 
adjustments as global demand has climbed. 

          If market forces had played a larger role in food trade, some now 
argue, the world would have had more time to adjust to more gradually rising 
prices. 

          "The international food trade didn't undergo the same kind of 
liberalization as other trade," said Richard Feltes, senior vice president of 
MF Global, a futures brokerage. "We can see now that the world has largely 
failed in its attempt to create an integrated food market." 

          In recent years, there has been a great push to liberalize food 
markets worldwide - part of what is known as the "Doha round" of world trade 
talks - but resistance has come from both the developed and developing worlds. 
Perhaps more than any other sector, nations have a visceral desire to protect 
their farmers, and thusly, their food supply. The current food crisis is 
causing advocates on both sides to dig in. 

          Consider, for instance, the French. 

          The European Union doles out about $41 billion a year in agriculture 
subsidies, with France getting the biggest share, about $8.2 billion. The 
27-nation bloc also has set a target for biofuels to supply 10 percent of 
transportation fuel needs by 2020 to combat global warming. 

          The French, whose farmers over the years have become addicted to 
generous government handouts, argue that agriculture subsidies must be 
continued and even increased in order to encourage more food production, 
especially with looming shortages. 

          Last week, French Agriculture Minister Michel Barnier warned E.U. 
officials against "too much trust in the free market." 

          "We must not leave the vital issue of feeding people," he said, "to 
the mercy of market laws and international speculation." 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Staff writers Dan Morgan, Steven Mufson and Jane Black in Washington 
and correspondents Ariana Eunjung Cha in Beijing, Emily Wax in New Delhi and 
John Ward Anderson in Paris contributed to this report.  
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to