-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Brant
Sent: February 29, 2008 9:31 AM
To: Triumph-Of Content
Subject: [TriumphOfContent] Facing Default, Some Walk Out on New Homes (The
NY Times)


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/us/29walks.html

The New York Times

February 29, 2008

Facing Default, Some Walk Out on New Homes

By JOHN LELAND

When Raymond Zulueta went into default on his mortgage last year, he  
did what a lot of people do. He worried.

In a declining housing market, he owed more than the house was worth,  
and his mortgage payments, even on an interest-only loan, had shot up  
to $2,600, more than he could afford. "I was terrified," said Mr.  
Zulueta, who services automated teller machines for an armored car  
company in the San Francisco area.

Then in January he learned about a new company in San Diego called  
You Walk Away that does just what its name says. For $995, it helps  
people walk away from their homes, ceding them to the banks in  
foreclosure.

Last week he moved into a three-bedroom rental home for $1,200 a  
month, less than half the cost of his mortgage. The old house is now  
the lender's problem. "They took the negativity out of my life," Mr.  
Zulueta said of You Walk Away. "I was stressing over nothing."

You Walk Away is a small sign of broad changes in the way many  
Americans look at housing. In an era in which new types of loans  
allowed many home buyers to move in with little or no down payment,  
and to cash out any equity by refinancing, the meaning of  
homeownership and foreclosure have changed, economists and housing  
experts say.

Last year the median down payment on home purchases was 9 percent,  
down from 20 percent in 1989, according to a survey by the National  
Association of Realtors. Twenty-nine percent of buyers put no money  
down. For first-time home buyers, the median was 2 percent. And many  
borrowed more than the price of the home in order to cover closing  
costs.

"I think I could make a case that some borrowers were 'renting' (with  
risk), rather than owning," Nicolas P. Retsinas, director of the  
Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University, said in an e- 
mail message.

For some people, then, foreclosure becomes something akin to eviction  
- a traumatic event, and a blow to one's credit record, but not one  
that involves loss of life savings or of years spent scrimping to buy  
the home.

"There certainly appears to be more willingness on the part of  
borrowers to walk away from mortgages," said John Mechem, spokesman  
for the Mortgage Bankers Association, who noted that in the past,  
many would try to save their homes.

In recent months top executives from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase  
and Wachovia have all described a new willingness by borrowers to  
walk away from mortgages.

Carrie Newhouse, a real estate agent who also works as a loss  
mitigation consultant for mortgage lenders in Minneapolis-St. Paul,  
said she saw many homeowners who looked at foreclosure as a first  
option, preferable to dealing with their lender. "I've had people say  
to me, 'My house isn't worth what I owe, why should I continue to  
make payments on it?' " Mrs. Newhouse said.

"You bought an adjustable rate mortgage and you're mad the bank is  
adjusting the rate," she said. "And sometimes the bank people who  
call these consumers aren't really nice. Not that the bank has the  
responsibility to be your friend, but a lot are just so uncooperative."

The same sorts of loans that drove the real estate boom now change  
the nature of foreclosure, giving borrowers incentives to walk away,  
said Todd Sinai, an associate professor of real estate at the Wharton  
School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

"There's a whole lot of people who would've been stuck as renters  
without these exotic loan products," Professor Sinai said. "Now it's  
like they can do their renting from the bank, and if house values go  
up, they become the owner. If they go down, you have the choice to  
give the house back to the bank. You aren't any worse off than  
renting, and you got a chance to do extremely well. If it's heads I  
win, tails the bank loses, it's worth the gamble."

In the boom market, homeowners took their winnings, withdrawing $800  
billion in equity from their homes in 2005 alone, according to RGE  
Monitor, an online financial research firm.

Since the Depression, American government policy has encouraged  
homeownership as an absolute good. It protects people from increases  
in rent and allows them to build equity as they pay off their  
mortgages. And it creates stability in communities, because owners  
are invested in their neighbors.

But new types of loans like interest-only mortgages and cash-out  
refinance loans mean buyers do not pay down their mortgages. And  
adjustable rate mortgages, which accounted for 39 percent of  
mortgages written in 2006, expose owners to rent-like rises in their  
housing costs.

The value of homeownership, then, has increasingly shifted to the  
home's likelihood to rise in value, like any other investment. And  
when investments go bad, people tend to walk away.

"When people don't have skin in the game, they behave like they don't  
have skin in the game," said Karl E. Case, a professor of economics  
at Wellesley College, who conducts regular surveys of borrowers as a  
founding partner of Fiserv Case Shiller Weiss, a real estate research  
firm.

Though many states give banks recourse to sue borrowers for their  
losses, Mr. Case said, in practice it's not often done "It's tough to  
do recourse," he said. "It's costly, and the amount of people's  
nonhousing wealth tends to be pretty slim."

Christian Menegatti, lead analyst at RGE Monitor, said the firm  
predicted more homeowners would walk away from their homes if prices  
continued to drop, regardless of their financial circumstances. If  
home prices drop an additional 10 percent, Mr. Menegatti said, 20  
million households will owe more than the value of their homes.

"Will everyone walk out?" he said. "No. But there's been a cultural  
shift. Buying a house used to be like entering a marriage, a  
commitment for life. Now, if you see something better, you go back  
into the dating market."

When homeowners see houses identical to their own selling for much  
less than they owe, Mr. Menegatti said, "I wouldn't be surprised to  
see five or six million homeowners walk away."

For Raymond Zulueta, the decision to go into foreclosure, and to hire  
You Walk Away, brought him peace of mind. The company assured him  
that in California he was not liable for his debt, and provided  
sessions with a lawyer and an accountant, as well as enrollment with  
a credit repair agency. He stopped paying his mortgage and used the  
money to pay down other debts.

Consumer advocates and others question the value of You Walk Away's  
service.

"We are more interested in servicers and borrowers coming to mutual  
resolutions through loan remediation," said Kevin Stein, associate  
director of the nonprofit California Reinvestment Coalition. "Even  
though we are not seeing good outcomes, we're not willing to throw up  
our hands and say people should walk away from their homes based on  
the advice of a company that stands to profit from foreclosure."

Jon Maddux, a founder of You Walk Away, said the company's services  
were not for everybody and were meant as a last resort. The company  
opened for business in January and says it has just over 200 clients  
in six states.

"It's not a moral decision," Mr. Maddux said of foreclosure. "The  
moral decision is, 'I need to pay my kids' health insurance or my car  
payment so I can get to work.' They made a bad decision, but they  
shouldn't make more bad ones just because they have this loan."

Mr. Zulueta said he felt he had let down the lender, himself, and his  
family.

"But you got to move on," he said. "I know in a few years my credit's  
going to be fine. If I want to get another house, it's going to be  
there. I'm not the only one who went through this. I know I'm working  
the system, but you got to do what you got to do. There's always  
loopholes."

Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TriumphOfContent/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TriumphOfContent/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


!DSPAM:2676,47c84154227561253889958!

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to