On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:58 -0700, Ethan Romander wrote:
> Thanks for this suggestion (also from Perry). Indeed, an "-iconic" flag
> was the first thing that I looked for; but alas, for my applications
> (firefox for one, evolution for another) there is no such feature. In
> addition, I saw in th
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 01:16 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> 2008/7/31 Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> # Default case -- if you want foo iconic, damn well tell it to. If
> "foo" accepts a way to change a class/title use it to your
> # advantage in its style.
> If this "foo" application doesn't have
2008/7/31 Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/31 Ethan Romander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I'd like to start an application in the iconified state from within my
>> FVWM InitFunction. I know that I can use the "Exec foo" command to
>
> No -- you want to associate it in your StartFunction testin
2008/7/31 Ethan Romander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to start an application in the iconified state from within my
> FVWM InitFunction. I know that I can use the "Exec foo" command to
No -- you want to associate it in your StartFunction testing for Test (Init).
> My best guess looks like thi
> Is there a more efficient way to associate the StartIconic
> style with a single Exec command?
Dunno about StartIconic, but some apps (e.g. xterm) will accept
a -iconic switch on the command line to start iconified.
I'd like to start an application in the iconified state from within my
FVWM InitFunction. I know that I can use the "Exec foo" command to
start the "foo" application and that I can use the StartIconic style or
Iconify command to minimize a window, but it is not clear to me how to
make these work t
