Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-04 Thread mark_at_yahoo
I'm going to document my own hatred for Wayland here, not that it will make any difference to its unstoppable adoption and the subsequent likely demise of FVWM. Note that I'm not an expert on the subject(s) nor do I have the time or inclination to become one as I'm 100% convinced that what I

Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-04 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Anno domini 2024 Sun, 4 Feb 01:14:21 +0100 Martin Cermak scripsit: > On Sun 2024-02-04 09:51 , Stuart Longland wrote: > [...] > > IMHO for FVWM to survive, the FVWM community needs to focus on > wayland. And start from scratch... I wish this happens. How many here have grey beards? I hope

Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-04 Thread Lucio Chiappetti
- Are people using FVWM for its looks? (Themability) Looks/functionallity: I want the MWM look/functionallity. Yes, I too like a simple mwm-like look, but even more I like the complete and easy customizability. I think there are proofs on the net of completely different looks. AND

Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-04 Thread Martin Cermak
On Sun 2024-02-04 09:51 , Stuart Longland wrote: > So either some of us need to step up and get familiar with how X11 works > (unlikely, it seems like a monumental task)… or we need to "pack our bags", > so to speak It hurts, but my sense is that the above is right. IMHO the distributions