On 09/01/11 00:19, Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 schrieb Harry portobello:
...
Terms like abrasive or short don't sit well with most people,
least of all those who wish to contribute. Thomas, how do you plan to
moderate these observations?
Harry
You may
To: Thomas Funk t.f...@web.de
Cc: fvwm@fvwm.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: FVWM: FAO: Thomas Adam - list attitudes and unveiling the person
behind email
Hullo,
On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk t.f...@web.de wrote:
Hi Harry,
as I red your email, my first
Could you just fuck off and do something productive?
Sorry for the attitude.
Harry portobello harryportobe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hullo,
On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk t.f...@web.de wrote:
Hi Harry,
as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for
Thomas
and
Many of us probably share the sentiment of 'pebcak',
but lack the eloquence to phrase it so succinctly.
There is no apparent record of a Harry Portobello as an writer or
reporter of anything. I assert that it is either a label he read off the bottom
of his Walmart rug or some inside joke about
2011/9/2 Jason Weber bab...@imonk.com:
Many of us probably share the sentiment of 'pebcak',
but lack the eloquence to phrase it so succinctly.
There is no apparent record of a Harry Portobello as an writer or
reporter of anything. I assert that it is either a label he read off the
bottom
... Besides that, if you really want to fight a
troll, just ignore it. We should really stop spamming the fvwm lists
right now. Let him speak alone if he really wants. If someone wants
more cheap gossip, please, keep it private for yourselves. I
subscribed to this list to read about fvwm, a window
--
Hi Dr. Klepp,
Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Klepp off...@klepp.biz [2011-09-01 09:19:16 +0200]:
You may like it or not: This list is professional.
Agree in general, but there have been occasional excursions.
From time to time, I've participated in (and occasionally chaired) various
professional
of chocolates - never know what you're gonna get.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Harry portobello harryportobe...@gmail.com
Gesendet: Aug 31, 2011 1:17:47 AM
An: fvwm@fvwm.org
Betreff: FVWM: FAO: Thomas Adam - list attitudes and unveiling the person
behind email
Hi all,
I've been reading the fvwm
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Harry portobello
harryportobe...@gmail.com wrote:
A few people have privately said to me lately that although they think
fvwm is a great program, they're not happy with the attitudes of the
most active maintainer, Thomas Adam.
This surprises me. Primarily
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Funk [mailto:t.f...@web.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:07 AM
To: Harry portobello; fvwm@fvwm.org
Subject: Re: FVWM: FAO: Thomas Adam - list attitudes and unveiling the
person behind email
Hi Harry,
as I red your email, my first
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Harry portobello
harryportobe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
*snip*
Some people prefer not to waste time with added fluff while
communicating, hackers are quite known for this (see also RMS, Linus,
Theo, etc.).
These people are often very busy and will not waste
Message-
From: Bert Geens [mailto:marelo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:20 AM
To: Harry portobello
Cc: fvwm@fvwm.org
Subject: Re: FVWM: FAO: Thomas Adam - list attitudes and unveiling the person
behind email
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Harry portobello
harryportobe
as a longtime lurker and very rare poster to the list...
i'm most unhappy when this sort of non-sense populates
the list...
Thomas is dedicated, technically excellent and enormously fair... given
the inane nature of these sideline (really gutter) discussions...
speaking quite honestly, i
Hi everyone.
I want to add my support to Thomas.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Harry portobello
harryportobe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hullo,
On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk t.f...@web.de wrote:
Hi Harry,
as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for
Harry portobello wrote:
[snip]
Harry:
when I read your first posting, I thought you were kidding around; I
admit I didn't read it to the end.
But now I am baffled: you seem to want to create a problem that does not
exist.
The replies you got on this list indicate that there is no issue with
15 matches
Mail list logo
