On 12 Sep 2002 09:03:08 +0200, Eric Doenges wrote:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
If you insist not to use any 2.4.x features, we can't help. The support on
this list and the FAQ (not counting some non-updated parts) is for 2.4.x.
[ ... ]
Yes, I forgot to mention that for -lock to work
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:35:24AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 12 Sep 2002 09:03:08 +0200, Eric Doenges wrote:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
If you insist not to use any 2.4.x features, we can't help. The support on
this list and the FAQ (not counting some non-updated parts) is for
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:35:24AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 12 Sep 2002 09:03:08 +0200, Eric Doenges wrote:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
If you insist not to use any 2.4.x features, we can't help. The support
on
this list and the
On 11 Sep 2002 09:44:26 +0200, Eric Doenges wrote:
first a short disclaimer -- I have no idea if this is the correct
mailing list, but there seems to be no other way of contacting the
fvwm maintainers. If this mail is inapropriate, I'm sorry.
Anyway, I have an addendum to FAQ 4.3 I'm
On 11 Sep 2002 15:41:08 +0200, Eric Doenges wrote:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
Well, this may be useful, but it is not the same, none of the X and FVWM
related constants are expanded, usual search paths are not used and so on.
I found that out the hard way shortly after sending my mail
