Hi all,
I cvs up today , but my configuration of fvwm seems not work for me. The
error code is:
[FVWM][FlocaleGetFontSet]: WARNING -- can't load font 'shadow =1
center:xft:arial:pixelsize=8:style=bold' trying default .
My configuration is:
Style *log Sticky,
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:12:30PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I cvs up today , but my configuration of fvwm seems not work for me. The
error code is:
[FVWM][FlocaleGetFontSet]: WARNING -- can't load font
'shadow =1 center:xft:arial:pixelsize=8:style=bold' trying default
Hello Mikhael,
Am 10:10 2003-05-15 + hat Mikhael Goikhman geschrieben:
On 14 May 2003 21:43:37 -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
If you want to use xwd, do something like:
key Print Exec /bin/sh -c 'sleep 10;xwd -root -out /tmp/xwd.out'
bind it to the printscreen key, hit the key, then
On 15 May 2003 15:14:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions but I have a question:
key Print Exec /bin/sh...
I was thinking, 'Key' has three values and the Action...
Is this right ???
It was a typo, Dan really meant:
Key Print A A Exec /bin/sh...
Question:
Hi,
Sorry for wrong typing shadow =1... :( It is shadow=1...
I am using gentoo linux, the X version is 4.3.0, fontconfig version is 2.2.0.
The configure output tells me:
With Asian bi-direct. text support? yes
With Gettext Native Lang Support? yes (libc)
With GTK+ required for
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: uwp 03/05/19 01:40:31
Modified files:
web-theme/themes: theme_descriptions.inc
Added files:
pictures/backgrounds: clouds01.jpg paper01.jpg stars01.jpg
Log message:
Added new backgrounds - chooseable via
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this msg 2 new cmds StyleById and DestroyStyleById.
StyleById applies styles to specific windows:
Pick Style $[w.id] NoTitle, !Borders
DestroyStyleById can destroy such a style.
The
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: uwp 03/05/19 02:04:07
Removed files:
pictures/decorations/border_grey_flat: bottom.gif
bottom_left.gif
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: uwp 03/05/19 02:13:32
fvwm-web/pictures/decorations/window_deco_aqua
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm-web/pictures/decorations/window_deco_aqua
In directory util1.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv12145/window_deco_aqua
Log
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: uwp 03/05/19 02:15:12
Added files:
pictures/decorations/window_deco_aqua: bottom.gif
bottom_left.gif
bottom_right.gif
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: uwp 03/05/19 02:27:08
Modified files:
web-theme/themes: theme_descriptions.inc
Log message:
Made new decorations available via customize page
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt03/05/19 03:04:09
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : focus.c style.c update.h
Log message:
* Fixed DestroyStyle problem.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt03/05/19 03:04:22
Modified files:
. : Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog NEWS
fvwm : Tag: branch-2_4 style.c
Log message:
* Fixed DestroyStyle problem.
--
Visit the official FVWM
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:52:23AM +0200, fvwm-workers wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
By the way I've noted a problem with the DestroyStyle cmd:
- Start an xterm
- Style * SloppyFocus
- Style XTerm ClickToFocus
- DestroyStyle XTerm
Then,
On 19 May 2003 08:30:00 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:27:12PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
[snip]
* Added x,r,w,f,i file conditions to the On command
What does it do?
In any case, it should have a separate command, not mix with other
non-related
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
Is this a final syntax we want to have? I prefer:
Pick WindowStyle NoTitle, !Borders
I think Tim suggested this syntax some years ago together with
SetupFunction, but I can't verify this right now.
I did, the spec is in WindowStyle_proposal.txt in CVS. I was
On 19 May 2003 08:52:23 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this msg 2 new cmds StyleById and DestroyStyleById.
StyleById applies styles to specific windows:
Pick Style $[w.id] NoTitle, !Borders
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this msg 2 new cmds StyleById and DestroyStyleById.
StyleById applies styles to specific windows:
Pick Style $[w.id] NoTitle,
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:39:30AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 19 May 2003 08:52:23 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this msg 2 new cmds StyleById and DestroyStyleById.
StyleById applies styles
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this msg 2 new cmds StyleById and DestroyStyleById.
StyleById applies
Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast
your votes here.
I vote for no because
1. It will even further delay delay the 2.6 release.
2. It will destabilise the code because of the delicate nature of
the style to window propagation.
3. It does not introduce a data
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:22:58PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
Attached to this
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast
your votes here.
I vote yes. But maybe the patch should be applied later.
I recall my intention: style by id is a great feature, with a simple
_hack_ we can get it, so
Olivier Chapuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Should the StyleById patch be applied before 2.6? Please cast
your votes here.
As I said It is just a tmp command.
If its just a temporary command, it would make sense to wait until
24 matches
Mail list logo