FVWM: detect running modules

2004-07-16 Thread Scott Smedley
Hi all, I'd like to be able to determine if a module is already loaded. Is there a way to do this? I'd like to be able to do something like: AddToFunc ToggleFvwmProxy + I Test (!ModuleRunning FvwmProxy) ModuleSynchronous FvwmProxy + I SendToModule FvwmProxy ShowToggle Key F11 A A Function Toggl

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:09:35PM -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > What you have explained below is not an option for us. We can't assume the > location that they are putting it. I can't even assume that they have root > access or write permissions in /usr/local or /opt. Given this, do you have >

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 16:09:35 -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > > What you have explained below is not an option for us. We can't assume > the location that they are putting it. I can't even assume that they > have root access or write permissions in /usr/local or /opt. Given > this, do you have any recomme

Re: FVWM: how to test for Raised but remove the "fully visible" condition

2004-07-16 Thread David Wu
Wow, that worked wonders!!! thanks so much again Dominik :) looks like you found a solution ! Thanks so much you are extreme :) David > Try the new condition "Overlapped" I just committed to CVS. > > Ciao > > Dominik ^_^ ^_^ > > -- > Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Dan Espen
"Moore, Garron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't just want to move the location for the sake of moving it. The = > disk layout of end system that will be using FVWM is unknown to me. I = > have no knowledge of their filesystem layout and directory structure. I = > need to prepare FVWM so that

RE: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Moore, Garron
What you have explained below is not an option for us. We can't assume the location that they are putting it. I can't even assume that they have root access or write permissions in /usr/local or /opt. Given this, do you have any recommendations? I would be willing to create a script that goes in

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 15:26:40 -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > > I don't just want to move the location for the sake of moving it. The > disk layout of end system that will be using FVWM is unknown to me. I > have no knowledge of their filesystem layout and directory structure. I > need to prepare FVWM so

RE: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Moore, Garron
I don't just want to move the location for the sake of moving it. The disk layout of end system that will be using FVWM is unknown to me. I have no knowledge of their filesystem layout and directory structure. I need to prepare FVWM so that wherever they want to place it on their disk, it will w

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 14:17:55 -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > > And then I would like to be able to run fvwm by doing > /newfolder/othernewfolder/fvwm/bin/fvwm > Is this possible? The instructions for doing this properly are in another message. > Is there a way to move the fvwm folder and still have it

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 13:55:44 -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > > We are using Solaris. We are using version 2.5.10. All of the machines > run the same version of Solaris and use SPARC processors. Some machines > are being deployed to and do not have compilers installed. Ideally, > fvwm will be installed in

RE: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Moore, Garron
More simply put, FVWM seems to embed its install location into itself which is making it hard for me to do the following. If I was able to do the following, my requirements would basically be satisfied: tar xzf fvwm-2.5.10.tar.gz cd fvwm-2.5.10 ./configure --prefix=/opt/fvwm (or whatever options

RE: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Moore, Garron
We are using Solaris. We are using version 2.5.10. All of the machines run the same version of Solaris and use SPARC processors. Some machines are being deployed to and do not have compilers installed. Ideally, fvwm will be installed into its own folder. This folder would then be copied onto a

Re: FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 12:14:56 -0700, Moore, Garron wrote: > > In our setup of FVWM, we need to be able to copy the FVWM installation > to other machines where FVWM will be located in different places in the > file system. These machines do not have compilers in them and won't be > able to build FVWM. It

FVWM: Window menu entries depending on window state

2004-07-16 Thread romildo
Hi. I want to have entries in the window menu for toggling some aspects of the window like shading. I want this entry to be named accodingly to the actual state of the window. For instance, if the window is shaded, the menu entry shuld be "Shade", otherwise "Unshade". To solve this I am using dyn

FVWM: Changing FVWM's location

2004-07-16 Thread Moore, Garron
In our setup of FVWM, we need to be able to copy the FVWM installation to other machines where FVWM will be located in different places in the file system. These machines do not have compilers in them and won't be able to build FVWM. It seems that the installation location is inserted in several

Re: FVWM: Re: Maximize/Restore buttons

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 09:43:00 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Up to now I have: [sample from original message] > > ButtonStyle 4 -- flat > AddButtonStyle 4 \ > Active (HGradient 128 Azure2 Azure1 -- flat) \ > Active (7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL > PROTECTED] [

Re: FVWM: Re: Wired problem with mozilla and FvwmTaskBar

2004-07-16 Thread Dan Espen
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am 2004-07-15 11:41:14, schrieb Dominik Vogt: > >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:48:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > >Mozilla or FvwmTaskBar? > > FvwmtaskBar > > >> fvwm: 2.5.10-8.michelle.1 > >> mozilla:2:1.6-6.backports.org.1 > > >Sou

FVWM: Re: Wired problem with mozilla and FvwmTaskBar

2004-07-16 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2004-07-15 11:41:14, schrieb Dominik Vogt: >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:48:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: >Mozilla or FvwmTaskBar? FvwmtaskBar >> fvwm: 2.5.10-8.michelle.1 >> mozilla:2:1.6-6.backports.org.1 >Sounds like a mozilla bug. I think that too, because mozilla 2:1.6-1

Re: FVWM: Avoiding email duplicates

2004-07-16 Thread Scott Smedley
> Scott, this is kind of controllable by you (and you will save others the > manual work needed to remove your address). Add this line to your muttrc: > > subscribe fvwm@fvwm.org fvwm-workers > > Then mutt will exclude your personal address in Mail-Followup-To: header. Ah! Very handy - thanks!

FVWM: Re: Maximize/Restore buttons

2004-07-16 Thread romildo
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:16:43AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:58:34AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:24:53PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Below is an excerpt from my configuration file where > > > I try to set the maximize/resto

Re: FVWM: how to test for Raised but remove the "fully visible" condition

2004-07-16 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:45:17AM -0400, David Wu wrote: > Hi all fvwm gurus > > Im trying to implement the following behavior in a function for use in > FvwmTaskBar's Click1 function. But I am having trouble doing so > > The following behavior is desired, note that the function will quit > usin

Re: FVWM: Bug in button style set with Vector and AllToggled state (was Re: Maximize/Restore buttons)

2004-07-16 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:58:34AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:24:53PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:27:38PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I want to set up one of two different images on button 4 > > > in the title bar

Re: FVWM: how to test for Raised but remove the "fully visible" condition

2004-07-16 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:45:17AM -0400, David Wu wrote: > Hi all fvwm gurus > > Im trying to implement the following behavior in a function for use in > FvwmTaskBar's Click1 function. But I am having trouble doing so > > The following behavior is desired, note that the function will quit > usin

FVWM: Avoiding email duplicates

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 15:35:27 +1000, Scott Smedley wrote: > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i > > In future, there is no need to CC me directly - I read all mail on > the FVWM lists. Scott, this is kind of controllable by you (and you will save others the manual work needed to remove your address). Add this lin

Re: FVWM: Desktop name variable

2004-07-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Jul 2004 11:46:57 +0300, Alexander V. Butenko wrote: > > in the manual i found a variable $[desk.name X], where X is the desktop > number. It returns the name of X desktop. Is it possible to make a feature > that checks if $[desk.name] used without the desktop number specification it > will

FVWM: Desktop name variable

2004-07-16 Thread Alexander V. Butenko
hi all, in the manual i found a variable $[desk.name X], where X is the desktop number. It returns the name of X desktop. Is it possible to make a feature that checks if $[desk.name] used without the desktop number specification it will return the name of current desktop. Now i realize this thing

Re: Fwd:Re: FVWM: HoverIcon for FvwmButtons (Was: animated FvwmButtons)

2004-07-16 Thread Scott Smedley
Hi Liu, > > The way transparency is implemented with "Pixmap none" is a bit hacky (IMO), > > especially when we're moving toward Colorsets. But I s'pose it should > > be backwards-compatible ... > > But after you merged the hover patch, 'pixmap none' fails to work. > It's perfect with the fvwm-sn

Re:Fwd:Re: FVWM: HoverIcon for FvwmButtons (Was: animated FvwmButtons)

2004-07-16 Thread liushidai
Hi SCoTT, In your mail: > > But the option "Pixmap none" don't work properly, ie it doesn't have > > a transparent background as expected. > > Still TODO. > > The way transparency is implemented with "Pixmap none" is a bit hacky (IMO), > especially when we're moving toward Colorsets. But I s'pos