to sources.list. Note that these aren't all that up-to-date; I think
the version there is still 2.5.6.
Nevertheless interesting ;-)
I guess the maintainer decided to put it in a separate apt-repository
instead of in the main unstable repository.
thanks,
Remko
--
Visit the official FVWM web
prevent them from adding the development
version as well, but under a different name (such as they do with a lot
of packages). And i too am longing for the FVWM development versions in
Debian unstable, because FVWM is about the only package i still have to
install from source.
cheers,
Remko
--
Visit
can say).
rt That's correct. Although that doesn't prevent them from adding the
rt development version as well, but under a different name (such as
rt they do with a lot of packages). And i too am longing for the FVWM
rt development versions in Debian unstable, because FVWM is about the
rt
. Although that doesn't prevent them from adding the development
version as well, but under a different name (such as they do with a lot
of packages). And i too am longing for the FVWM development versions in
Debian unstable, because FVWM is about the only package i still have to
install from source
Hi everyone
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
Thanks
--
Stuart Logie
Programmer
UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD
Tel : (011) 712 1371 Cell : 082
* Sep 04 17:36 stu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone
Hi, there!
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk
asking it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only
provides fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
My guess is a lazy/inactive package maintainer. Mail
On 04 Sep 2003 19:36:44 +0200, stu wrote:
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
Meantime, you may try these deb snapshots from a month ago, newer than
stu wrote:
Hi everyone
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes
Am 17:25 2003-06-03 +0200 hat Fernando Poza geschrieben:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
So, it looks like fvwm package has become orphaned, or whatever way
Hello Fernando,
Am 15:27 2003-06-03 +0200 hat Fernando Poza geschrieben:
Hi there!
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb
* Jun 11 18:10 Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Not right, because there are only security updates in Debian
and not new Versions...
Not quite true either. That depends on if you are using stable (woody),
testing (sarge) or unstable (sid).
--
Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hi there!
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
fvwm.org.
Am I right?, or I'm just not looked for correctly. Then, where can I
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
fvwm.org.
Am I right?, or I'm
* Jun 03 16:18 Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box,
and I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the
thing is that it seems there is no debian package
On 03 Jun 2003 16:40:10 +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
* Jun 03 16:18 Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box,
and I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:25:26PM +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
Here in testing I have 2.4.15-2
Klaus
So, it looks like
Fernando Poza wrote:
Hi there!
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
fvwm.org.
Am I right?, or I'm just not looked
On 03 Jun 2003 17:25:26 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
So, it looks like fvwm package has become orphaned, or whatever way
18 matches
Mail list logo
