Hello,
I must confess I'm not very fond of listen only modules. I believe it
is more of a hack than a long term solution to the shell script
module problem. And I would really like it removed, and for that the
sooner the better.
So I was messing around to see if it was really needed, and it's
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I must confess I'm not very fond of listen only modules. I believe it
is more of a hack than a long term solution to the shell script
module problem. And I would really like it removed, and for that the
sooner the better.
So I was messing
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:15:21AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I must confess I'm not very fond of listen only modules. I believe it
is more of a hack than a long term solution to the shell script
module
On 8/14/07, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:15:21AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I must confess I'm not very fond of listen only modules. I believe it
is more
On 8/13/07, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
The NEWS file is
On 14Aug2007 19:11, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Running FvwmCommandS is a security exposure.
|Some users might be reluctant to use it.
|
| I don't use FvwmCommand because it's too slow. [...]
| I do not want to start an executable every n seconds [...]
|
| You missed
