On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:39:40AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "TA" == Thomas Adam writes:
>
> TA> It was a joke. Then I did an even funnier thing and released them.
> TA> Bad timing.
>
> Indeed.
>
> The files are in place. The ANNOUNCE file did not seem to be updated,
> so I d
> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes:
TA> It was a joke. Then I did an even funnier thing and released them.
TA> Bad timing.
Indeed.
The files are in place. The ANNOUNCE file did not seem to be updated,
so I did not mail it out to fvwm-announce as is customary.
- J<
There was a joke followed by a real release.
-Original Message-
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Well, the announcement I received was certainly a joke, and when I asked
I was told that it was a joke. So I've no idea what's going on.
- J<
On 6 April 2010 19:02, Adam Goode wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 01:57 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> I thought 2.5.29 was an April fools joke of some type? The announcement
>> was not accompanied by tarballs.
>>
>
> Not according to:
> http://www.fvwm.org/news/
It was a joke. Then I did an even fu
Well, the announcement I received was certainly a joke, and when I asked
I was told that it was a joke. So I've no idea what's going on.
- J<
On 04/06/2010 01:57 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I thought 2.5.29 was an April fools joke of some type? The announcement
> was not accompanied by tarballs.
>
Not according to:
http://www.fvwm.org/news/
Adam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I thought 2.5.29 was an April fools joke of some type? The announcement
was not accompanied by tarballs.
- J<
Hi,
I am trying to get fvwm 2.5.29 to build some new Fedora packages. It
looks like ftp://ftp.fvwm.org/pub/fvwm/version-2/ does not contain
either bz2 or gz versions of this package.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
