CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: migo01/05/24 16:26:17
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog Makefile.am
docs : ChangeLog FAQ
fvwm : read.c
Log message:
* Makefile.am: make older bzip2 work too
* read.c: co
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: dane01/05/24 12:01:55
Modified files:
docs : ChangeLog FAQ
Log message:
FAQ: Add gmc and kfm as possibilities for question 7.13.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe
"Nils Lohner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ~ > uname -a
> SunOS topaze 5.7 Generic_106541-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> ~ > fvwm2 -version
> FVWM version 2.3.32 compiled on May 17 2001 at 11:21:38
> with support for: ReadLine, XPM, GNOME WM hints, SM
>
> When I go over an icon that's partially
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> FVWM Bug Tracking notification
>
> new message incoming/716
>
> Message summary for PR#716
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Gtk -- require to compile ???
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:28:34 -0500
> 0 replies 0 followups
>
> > ORIGIN
Jason L Tibbitts III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The snapshot built OK and I downloaded it and built it on another machine
> as well. Everything seems OK now; can everyone check it?
I can confirm that fvwm-snap-20010524 compiles nicely on my machine.
--
André Dahlqvist <[
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JLT> I just cleaned out the tree and checked it out again; we'll see how
JLT> tomorrow morning's build goes.
The snapshot built OK and I downloaded it and built it on another machine
as well. Everything seems OK now; can everyone check
FVWM Bug Tracking notification
new message incoming/716
Message summary for PR#716
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gtk -- require to compile ???
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:28:34 -0500
0 replies 0 followups
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS <
>From [EMAIL P
FVWM Bug Tracking notification
new message incoming/715
Message summary for PR#715
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FvwmWharf does not update on colorset update
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 02:05:33 -0500
0 replies 0 followups
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS <