Re: FvwmTabs module

2005-11-03 Thread Scott Smedley
> i find that it's a pity that there isn't a simple and > useful behavior of FvwmTabs like in Fluxbox. > Indeed, in Fluxbox you just have to move the title bar of a window to > another one and the two titlebar are one. I've never used Fluxbox but from what you say it sounds like the drag-&-drop

gnome menus in fvwm

2005-11-03 Thread Dan Barber
Hi all, I build the Mutagenix LiveCD Suite(http://mutagenix.org) which provides fvwm as an alternate to GNOME for the desktop CD. I wanted to be able to provide an fvwm menu which would give access to all the GNOME programs already installed on the CD. I came up with a small script which ge

Re: FvwmTabs module

2005-11-03 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
Just to clarify. By "ready" I didn't mean the functionality (this is something users should decide about), but the fact it is written properly. So that even it requires some external things (tk and more), these are not required in installation time, and the module is still runnable without them. R

Re: FvwmTabs module

2005-11-03 Thread Le Floc'h Jérémy
On 03 Nov 2005 16:03:56 +1100, Scott Smedley wrote: A while back there was some talk about including the FvwmTabs module as part of the Fvwm distribution. Are people still happy for this to happen? You should include it. It is fully ready for this. Regards, Mikhael. First of all i

Re: FvwmTabs module

2005-11-03 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 03 Nov 2005 16:03:56 +1100, Scott Smedley wrote: > > A while back there was some talk about including the FvwmTabs > module as part of the Fvwm distribution. Are people still happy > for this to happen? You should include it. It is fully ready for this. Regards, Mikhael.